Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

1st Year 2nd Gen 1956 SAA

Comments

3 comments

  • Spider7115
    Unfortunately, for collector purposes, the nickel finish is "opinion" rather than "fact". I agree that your SAA probably was returned to the factory for plating, which was much better than modern plating due to EPA involvement with the chemical process. However, with the factory letter indicating a blue/case hardened finish, you will always face the argument as to the true origin of the nickel plating.
    0
  • oldbuckaroo
    Thanks Spider 7115.

    BTW, I did forget to mention that this SAA is .45LC with 5 1/2" barrel. The Colt letter said Type of Stocks "Not Specified". It's currently fitted with a very nice pair of Sambar Stag with noticable age yellowing coloration and really deep, pronounced bark. They don't have the Colt medallion however, so not sure when or where they were installed.
    0
  • Spider7115
    quote:Originally posted by oldbuckaroo
    Thanks Spider 7115.

    BTW, I did forget to mention that this SAA is .45LC with 5 1/2" barrel. The Colt letter said Type of Stocks "Not Specified". It's currently fitted with a very nice pair of Sambar Stag with noticable age yellowing coloration and really deep, pronounced bark. They don't have the Colt medallion however, so not sure when or where they were installed.

    It most likely had black rubber grips, although walnut was an option. However, I would think optional stocks would show on the factory letter.

    We recently had a situation similar to yours involving a 1st Generation Colt SAA. Most people felt the nickle finish was done by Colt, probably through returning to the factory for plating, but the letter said it left with a blued finish. Once again, the origin of the finish was lost in history as factory documentation was lacking.

    IMG_0296.jpg
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity