Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

s&w 642 - tame recoil???

Comments

6 comments

  • charliemeyer007
    With bullseye as long as the bullet makes it out of the tube you are good. I think that will hold true for reddot also. I think the 148 hollow base wadcutter seated backwards makes a good round.
    0
  • pirate2501
    I have been loading 147 gr hardcast lead bullets with 2.7 gr of Bullseye. Yes they do kick in my S&W 642 but you can shoot them all day long in my Taurus 66 with a 6" barrel.
    0
  • perry shooter
    BUY a heavier pistol . Recoil is a result of weight of the bullet out one end and weight of pistol on the other. For every action there is an equal opposite reaction.
    0
  • Mk 19
    My sister bought a 642 as a carry gun and found the same problem. I loaded up some 125gr RNFP's with 3.8gr of Unique and it made a big difference that allowed her a bit of practice time with the gun. But then she did something that removed the whole problem, she traded that 642 for a Ruger SP-101. Now those 125gr loads feel like a .22lr and she can shoot all day long, well as long as I keep her stocked up in ammo.
    0
  • Riomouse911
    That's a bit of "Newton's shootin' law"; The light gun that makes for great carry makes for increased recoil.

    See if you can cast 125 gr bullets, or find lighter ones if possible, then use this guy's page:
    http://www.reloadammo.com/38loads.htm

    I've used several of his loads, and they seem to work just fine.
    0
  • 1935Lee
    Hogue grips Are these the soft rubber?
    I would recommend several backwards steps

    1 practice with light loads in a heaver revolver

    2 practice with light loads (wax)

    3 consider alternative home defense weapons, 12 gauge coach gun with barrels cut back to bare legal minimum loaded with light loads of smallest shot you can find and or cans of wasp spray placed in strategic locations, anything that can be used as a weapon.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?