Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

model 54?

Comments

5 comments

  • richarda
    Should be a two-digit year date on the bottom of the chamber portion of the barrel. ??
    0
  • rufe-snow
    Need quality close-up photos, for identification and valuation.

    Instructions for posting photos at this link.


    http://forums.GunBroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=259294




    EDIT #1,

    OP's photo of Model 54.





    01_zps9b8712c8.jpg
    0
  • MG1890
    OK, I have the Rule book in front of me... I read that total production is 52,029, INCLUDING 2,005 special order rifles. These 2,005 are scattered throughout production.

    Model 70's did not come with a single hole rear bridge. Nor did your 54.

    Bolt handle mods to accommodate a scope correlate with that nonfactory rear hole.

    Odds are it's just another messed up Winchester; pics would tell the story.

    Oh, and an actual "special order" 54 should be fairly easy to spot.

    The Marble's rear sounds nonfactory, and why a Lyman 48 on a suspected "factory scoped" 54??

    It just don't add up. Sorry.
    0
  • kimi
    I know next to nothing about the model 54, however, I do know that they immediately followed Winchester's little known production of their Type No. 1 and Type No. 2 Sniper Rifles that were built on the Springfield 1903 action, with the Type No. 2's being custom made guns. Both types were fitted with scope blocks and used a Lyman 48 type rear sight to boot. Winchester did an awful lot of work that hardly anyone knows about today, but proving it is the tough part as you would know. What is the barrel date?
    0
  • Ambrose
    I have four Model 54's. The latest one is a .220 Swift #49480A. From the single photo, it looks to me like the bolt handle is standard for the 54. From what I can see, it does not resemble the bolt handles on my old model 70's. Of course it was common to set up these rifles with Lyman 48 sights after purchase and also common to drill holes in the receiver ring and bridge. I would not assume any of these modifications were factory done. It certainly could have happened; according to my old catalogs, Winchester sold model 70's fitted with the Lyman 48WJS sight in 1950 for $13.75 more than with the standard rear sight (the sight itself sold for $12.50 that year) so they probably did the same with the 54. but, as you've discovererd, there's no way to tell for sure. It appears to be a decent old rifle and, since it shoots very well, I'd keep it and use it for what it is and not worry about what it's worth.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?