Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

S&W alloy cylinder pros and cons

Comments

6 comments

  • Laredo Lefty
    I have 2 617's, a 10 shot with the alloy cylinder and a 6 shot with stainless cylinder. The alloy cylinder makes the gun lighter obviously, it also makes the cylinder rotate faster in double action. I have not seen any loosening of the lock-up after several hundred rounds. The gun is super accurate, I can hit empty 12ga shells thrown in the air with it.

    IMG_2131.jpg
    0
  • austin20
    quote:Originally posted by Laredo Lefty
    I have 2 617's, a 10 shot with the alloy cylinder and a 6 shot with stainless cylinder. The alloy cylinder makes the gun lighter obviously, it also makes the cylinder rotate faster in double action. I have not seen any loosening of the lock-up after several hundred rounds. The gun is super accurate, I can hit empty 12ga shells thrown in the air with it.

    IMG_2131.jpg
    Dayum, that is good shootin. Would the alloy command a higher price?
    0
  • Laredo Lefty
    It might just because the alloy cylinder version was only made for about 1 year. It was discontinued due to poor sales in favor of the SS cylinder version.
    0
  • austin20
    Gotcha. Thank you for the info.
    0
  • JOELBLACK
    I just looked at a SS version a few days ago and felt it was much heavier than my old 1950's vintage Model 17.
    0
  • beantownshootah
    quote:Originally posted by JOELBLACK
    I just looked at a SS version a few days ago and felt it was much heavier than my old 1950's vintage Model 17.


    It is heavier.

    Unlike the old K-22/model 17, the 617 is actually built on the slightly beefier "L" frame (not the "K"). If you take a look at the picture above, the 617 has a full barrel underlug.

    Whether that's good or bad depends on your point of view. Heavier gun = steadier gun = more accuracy. Heavier gun also equals more weight to lug around with you all day, slower to point (not a big deal in a .22, I don't think), and increased shooter fatigue when shooting a lot of rounds.

    FWIW, given the choice here, I'd prefer the steel cylinder version. IMO, I'd rather have the extra durability of the steel over a relatively small weight difference.

    If you're talking an ENTIRE alloy version of this gun (ie frame AND cylinder), that's a different story, but I don't think Smith ever made something like that.

    wouldn't buy the alloy cylinder version of this. I'm sure its OK, but
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?