1911's
[b
Would you happen to know anything about 1911's 45 Military
matching ###S but seem to be world War 1 reworks ...On gun it has (AA).But I was told by A gun dealer that he has never seen any 1911'S for this year that were this clean!!
Also in the group is a (Ace 22 1911)
training pistol One 45 is a RemingtonRan The Other is a Colt.
I beleive the date on guns is 1913 (USA)
Any info would be great.
Thanks Ricklue][/blue][}:)]
Would you happen to know anything about 1911's 45 Military
matching ###S but seem to be world War 1 reworks ...On gun it has (AA).But I was told by A gun dealer that he has never seen any 1911'S for this year that were this clean!!
Also in the group is a (Ace 22 1911)
training pistol One 45 is a RemingtonRan The Other is a Colt.
I beleive the date on guns is 1913 (USA)
Any info would be great.
Thanks Ricklue][/blue][}:)]
0
-
I am not a big pistol guy, but I have a request for some info/recommendation. Budget is around $800.00. How do you compare the Ruger vs the Remington. (45ACP)---I'm mostly interested in function/reliability. Any other brand would be fine, but, again I'm not an expert in handguns. Your thoughts please. THX GUYS 0 -
A pistol so good they named a year after it. I have had 5, now down to 2. I don't shoot them much any more because I get tired of looking for the spent brass. With wheel guns I spend my time shooting.
A fully tuned up shooter gives up some of the in the field; combat conditions function ability.
Cheap to feed if you cast your own bullets. about 1500 rounds per pound of Bullseye.0 -
Logansdad,
Simply put-- it is my favorite pistol, (for revolver, it's the M-19 S&W). Yet that is an opinion. And, too, I am not much acquainted with the newer plastic frames types, (i.e. Glocks), striker fired, what have you?
Pros:
Price... is quite acceptable for a bare-bones military configuration. And the skies the limit for bells and whistles.
Parts & accessories... you name, it can be had.
Reliability: If it didn't work up to snuff it wouldn't be here after 100-yrs plus. And still in use by the professionals-- military & L.E.
Cons: ? Though myself do not, someone may have some gripe with this fine firearm. Which, as you state, will probably be in the comparing mode, Ford or Chevy? Or maybe because it is single action, or other supposed design non-perfection, whatever? I surely have never felt handicapped by this sidearm.
Yet the proof is in it's quite long and quite illustrious history up to this very day-- a winner.
45er
EDITP.S. Now that you're talked into it, hah, the real debate will be which brand/configuration/etc! Lets the sparks fly!0 -
1911's are fine weapons in the 1911A1 form. I've had dozens and they are an extremely serviceable weapon, requiring little alteration from stock. The caliber is adequate for unarmored targets and reliability is very good.
I would still carry one if I had not discovered and evaluated a Tokarev in 7.62x25mm. A Browning design, albeit modified, that is even more reliable with a high speed cartridge.0 -
I like 1911's as well as other designs. I have about a dozen of them, but carry a 15 shot Glock 19 for everyday use. The fact that they have been around for over a hundred years says it all. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by Logansdad1030
Folks like the old Chevy ford debate I sure everyone one has their special likes and dislikes.
Please advise am considering buying one and need feedback.
If you own one what's your like and dislike ?
Thanks
Wayne
Note that almost all of my opinions below are, by definition, subjective.
OBJECTIVELY, the 1911 is a solid performing pistol, as already mentioned, these wouldn't have been the standard US military service pistol for 75 years, and wouldn't still be in wide military, police, and civilian use if they didn't do what they are supposed to do. If you want a service type or range gun, IMO this is still a perfectly viable choice, even after 100 years.
Like: 45 ACP caliber is good, ergonomics are good, consistent single-action trigger is potentially very good for a service type pistol (and this is arguably still the best thing about this particular platform). Most popular auto platform in world makes it easy to customize any pistol in any way you can imagine (and some you can't!). Part and accessories are readily available and relatively inexpensive. Gun is highly reliable with ball ammo, though at this point, pretty much all of the service type autos (Glock, Beretta, Sig, CZ, etc) are highly reliable too.
Dislike: Gun is HEAVY. . .stock 1911 weighs 2.5 lbs. That makes it good for shooting, not so good for carry. There are people who carry these concealed all day long. . .I can't do it. Personally not a fan of safety on "cocked and locked" carry in defensive gun, though this is fine for range.
Neutral: Sights on STOCK (old military type) 1911s are poor. . .not an issue with any modern rendition, though. 7+1 capacity is pretty low for a modern service type gun. . .though again, since I'm not going to war, nor expecting to carry this to a gunfight, not an issue for me. (I'm typically happy with a 5 or 6 shot revolver, so 7 is plenty). Grip safety design doesn't work for everyone (though I've never had a problem with one, and there are ways to address this issue if you have a problem but otherwise like the platform). Stock gun may not be friendly to left-handers (again, not issue for me).0 -
Hard to beat Series 70 Colt with adjustable sights.GOLD-CUP model. With that said Most of these in good condition will demand Collector pricing. I might consider the series 80 Gold Cup "cost less and easy to remove the series 80 parts and replace those parts that with ones for better trigger pull. Very small cost involved . IMHO adjustable sights are a must. 0 -
Something that might help folk give you better advice would be to know what the intended purpose of the firearm is. Are you going to use the gun for target shooting, plinking, home defense, or concealed carry? 0 -
As stated above, the intended purpose is important.
For target and general field carry, it is hard to beat. For concealed carry, there are many other choices that would fit the bill better.
I have 1911's from several manufacturers that are accurate and I shoot. I even use them in IDPA, but I would not consider them for general CCW carry.0 -
While I do concur with most all of the replies, I will add some more...
While I do like the 1911/1911A1 platform, and own six of them(Colt Gold Cup Trophy, Colt Series 70 National Match Gold Cup 1977 vintage NIB, Para Ordnance 14/45 SS Limited, and 3 Wilsons(Protector, and 2 Super Grades) They are not a pistol for the entry level beginner. There are two ways to carry the 1911 platform...chamber empty, or chamber loaded. The chamber loaded, method, requires the operator to carry it "cocked and locked". I repeat, loaded chamber carry means cocked and locked, as there is NO safe method to lower the hammer on a loaded chamber.
On the flip side of the coin...for the experienced hand gunner, that is comfortable in their own skin to carry one cocked and locked, it is most likely the best platform available, for those who like single action.
Best0 -
1. Because I just want one to go play with have fun shooting it
2. Have my carry pistol not changing it px4 storm 40 cal
3. Just always wanted one
0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
11 comments