HELP-1870 Enfield Musket
Friends,
A friend of mine, has a very nice condition 1870 Enfield Musket. This is not the 1870 Tower gun which is a percussion muzzleloader.
This rifle has a swiveling breech block. I am interested in the caliber of this rifle, and was it metallic cartridge, or a paper cartridge rifle? I have not personally had the chance to give it the once over, but just word of mouth.
Best
A friend of mine, has a very nice condition 1870 Enfield Musket. This is not the 1870 Tower gun which is a percussion muzzleloader.
This rifle has a swiveling breech block. I am interested in the caliber of this rifle, and was it metallic cartridge, or a paper cartridge rifle? I have not personally had the chance to give it the once over, but just word of mouth.
Best
0
-
From your description of the breech-block, it sounds like a Snider conversion..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snider-Enfield0 -
Originally posted by rufe-snow
More than likely it's a "Snider", as shown in this photo. It was one of the first cartridge firearms adopted by the British. There quite famous and well known. GOOGLE search will bring you loads of information and photos. The cartridge they fired was known as the .577 Snider,
The cartridges the Snider used had a integral primer in a metal base, attached to paper cartridge. That made it look like a oldtime shotgun shell.
0 -
it 'sounds like' a snyder conversion from muzzel loader to breech loader. it fires a .577 cartridge.
0 -
Thank all of you gentlemen for the information. That is exactly what it is. It looks as if that mechanism could be delicate or even fragile...more so than the trap door.
Best0 -
Wow, this place is awesome! I learn things here often. I never heard of such a thing, but there's lots of stuff I never heard of. Cool! 0 -
The projectile on that looks somewhat similar to the springfield 1863. That was the US civil war black powder which fired a .58 mini ball.
Looks like the Britts were transitioning with this gun to a modern cartridge prototype.0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
6 comments