Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

New Jersey Nurse Quarantined in a Tent

Comments

70 comments

  • JamesRK
    quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
    Do you really not understand ?

    The infection, if it had been present, would not have been communicable at the time the nurse was quarantined.

    Even serial PCR testing revealed no virus.

    Hence, no quarantine would be medically necessary or reasonable.

    Do you really not understand?

    The people who actually know a lot more about Ebola than any of the rest of us admit they don't know when and how Ebola is communicable. They admitted yesterday they aren't sure it isn't airborne.
    0
  • CaptFun
    quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
    quote:Originally posted by CaptFun
    If you honestly think for a minute that letting people who have been exposed to chicken pox (much less ebola) into the country without a quarantine is good for the general welfare then you sir really should not be playing with firearms.

    Really.

    And that is the end of this circus. I will send it over to the crew in politics to deal with.




    Chickenpox ?

    Who was talking about chickenpox ?

    Chickenpox is endemic.

    Reckon they should quarantine for influenza, too ?

    Herpes ?

    Norovirus ?


    Maybe everybody should have a total infectious disease workup upon entry to the country.

    Like I said, if it's good enough for your dogs, perhaps you are now volunteering for quarantine, too ?



    hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    Get real.



    If I had been in a poophole hot zone, I would certainly quarantine my self for more than the 21 days before visiting my family.

    Lets play a game and see who notices that Barzilla has been quarantined for 21 days. (or more. depends on if I have a fever or not.)
    0
  • JamesRK
    quote:Originally posted by skicat
    They are willing to risk exposure to a deadly virus in a third world country and are considered heroes for this sacrifice but then balk at a 3 week quarantine to safeguard the lives of an entire nation. That makes no sense to me.

    It's good that it makes no sense to you. When you start making sense out of nonsense you have a problem that might not be treatable. [;)] [:D]
    0
  • JamesRK
    quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
    You are hearing what you want, and filtering what you do hear according to your fears.

    "They" said....

    Don't know what or who you heard say whatever you think you heard.

    Would be glad to discuss something that can actually be accurately quoted.

    Ebola is the least of my fears so my fears don't enter into it. My old body is completely worn out and used up. The flu or a worse than usual cold would probably kill me, and I don't fear that either. I have accepted the fact that I won't be the third person to get out of this life alive. I don't know when or how or why I will die, but I will die. That doesn't bother me.

    Occasionally I try to use a little common sense. Common sense tells me when there is something that can kill a bunch of people you do what you can to control the spread.

    As for who said what when, I don't take notes of names dates and places when I'm listening to radio news. Don't plan to start. Can you give me the names dates and places of the people who said they do know how Ebola is communicated and how to get the fatality under seventy percent?
    0
  • Mr. Perfect
    quote:Originally posted by CaptFun
    quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
    quote:Originally posted by CaptFun
    If you honestly think for a minute that letting people who have been exposed to chicken pox (much less ebola) into the country without a quarantine is good for the general welfare then you sir really should not be playing with firearms.

    Really.

    And that is the end of this circus. I will send it over to the crew in politics to deal with.




    Chickenpox ?

    Who was talking about chickenpox ?

    Chickenpox is endemic.

    Reckon they should quarantine for influenza, too ?

    Herpes ?

    Norovirus ?


    Maybe everybody should have a total infectious disease workup upon entry to the country.

    Like I said, if it's good enough for your dogs, perhaps you are now volunteering for quarantine, too ?



    hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    Get real.



    If I had been in a poophole hot zone, I would certainly quarantine my self for more than the 21 days before visiting my family.

    Lets play a game and see who notices that Barzilla has been quarantined for 21 days. (or more. depends on if I have a fever or not.)
    what do I win?
    0
  • Marc1301
    quote:Originally posted by JamesRK
    quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
    You are hearing what you want, and filtering what you do hear according to your fears.

    "They" said....

    Don't know what or who you heard say whatever you think you heard.

    Would be glad to discuss something that can actually be accurately quoted.

    Ebola is the least of my fears so my fears don't enter into it. My old body is completely worn out and used up. The flu or a worse than usual cold would probably kill me, and I don't fear that either. I have accepted the fact that I won't be the third person to get out of this life alive. I don't know when or how or why I will die, but I will die. That doesn't bother me.

    Occasionally I try to use a little common sense. Common sense tells me when there is something that can kill a bunch of people you do what you can to control the spread.

    As for who said what when, I don't take notes of names dates and places when I'm listening to radio news. Don't plan to start. Can you give me the names dates and places of the people who said they do know how Ebola is communicated and how to get the fatality under seventy percent?


    Well said James. I think you spoke for a lot of us 'normal' folks that still have common sense.
    0
  • Marc1301
    quote:Originally posted by CaptFun
    quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
    quote:Originally posted by CaptFun
    If you honestly think for a minute that letting people who have been exposed to chicken pox (much less ebola) into the country without a quarantine is good for the general welfare then you sir really should not be playing with firearms.

    Really.

    And that is the end of this circus. I will send it over to the crew in politics to deal with.




    Chickenpox ?

    Who was talking about chickenpox ?

    Chickenpox is endemic.

    Reckon they should quarantine for influenza, too ?

    Herpes ?

    Norovirus ?


    Maybe everybody should have a total infectious disease workup upon entry to the country.

    Like I said, if it's good enough for your dogs, perhaps you are now volunteering for quarantine, too ?



    hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    Get real.



    If I had been in a poophole hot zone, I would certainly quarantine my self for more than the 21 days before visiting my family.

    Lets play a game and see who notices that Barzilla has been quarantined for 21 days. (or more. depends on if I have a fever or not.)
    Now that's funny![:0][:p]
    0
  • Mr. Perfect
    quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
    quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
    Good to know that ebola is not a communicable disease.


    Do you really not understand ?

    The infection, if it had been present, would not have been communicable at the time the nurse was quarantined.

    Even serial PCR testing revealed no virus.

    Hence, no quarantine would be medically necessary or reasonable.
    I just have to respond to this post, because it demonstrates, with clarity, the dodge and weave of our (now quarantined) forum contrarian.

    The entire argument was: you don't quarantine for "contacts" only.

    In fact, here is one representative unequivocal statement:

    quote:When I say cases, not contacts, that refers to the current evidence based practice of isolating/quarantining persons who actually have, or are even reasonably thought to have, a communicable disease.

    Not people who have possibly been exposed, termed contacts.

    When that was supposedly refuted by citing NJ law (apparently from 2005) that suggested, yes... contacts are quarantined. The argument shifted to one of "that law isn't current".


    So, I posted up the current NJ state law and health code that shows that yes, quarantine is used for "contacts". It's there in red above.

    That the law was current now being firmly established beyond argument, our contrarian shifted to this most recent argument, that quarantine is not justified because she was not "communicable".

    I note that this argument was only slightly different than the first, but apparently it is the only argument left.

    Either way, the law appears to read to me that it specifically specifies quarantine of contacts.[:I]

    Does anyone left here disagree?
    0
  • Marc1301
    Nay.

    Our 'contrarian' would make a good fit for the selfish ass of a nurse that is now in Maine and refusing to comply with a stay at home quarantine.
    0
  • Dads3040
    quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
    quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
    quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
    Good to know that ebola is not a communicable disease.


    Do you really not understand ?

    The infection, if it had been present, would not have been communicable at the time the nurse was quarantined.

    Even serial PCR testing revealed no virus.

    Hence, no quarantine would be medically necessary or reasonable.
    I just have to respond to this post, because it demonstrates, with clarity, the dodge and weave of our (now quarantined) forum contrarian.

    The entire argument was: you don't quarantine for "contacts" only.

    In fact, here is one representative unequivocal statement:

    quote:When I say cases, not contacts, that refers to the current evidence based practice of isolating/quarantining persons who actually have, or are even reasonably thought to have, a communicable disease.

    Not people who have possibly been exposed, termed contacts.

    When that was supposedly refuted by citing NJ law (apparently from 2005) that suggested, yes... contacts are quarantined. The argument shifted to one of "that law isn't current".


    So, I posted up the current NJ state law and health code that shows that yes, quarantine is used for "contacts". It's there in red above.

    That the law was current now being firmly established beyond argument, our contrarian shifted to this most recent argument, that quarantine is not justified because she was not "communicable".

    I note that this argument was only slightly different than the first, but apparently it is the only argument left.

    Either way, the law appears to read to me that it specifically specifies quarantine of contacts.[:I]

    Does anyone left here disagree?



    Nope. I think you covered it pretty well. I noticed when the argument shifted, and that is always a sure sign of someone losing.

    The scary part is that we seem to have medical professionals in this country who lack the common sense James illustrated above. General Honoree said 'You can't fix stupid', and even worse when 'stupid' has what passes for an education.

    Been in a 3rd world craphole where people are dying right and left of OggaBoogaitis? Stay away from other people until you are sure you can't pass along the disease.

    Well done to you for the technical obliteration of the silliness, and also to James for summing up the Man-on-the-Street version.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?