Identify This Barrel
I need help identifying the action this barrel fits. It is 22 1/4" long, 0.635" outside diameter at the muzzle, 1.050" outside diameter at the breech, and there are 10 square threads per inch. It is marked '30:06 at 9:00 oclock near the breech. The unusual front sight and dovetailed barrel stud are different than any I have seen. Any info will be appreciated!
[img][/img]
[img][/img]
[img][/img]
[img][/img]
[img][/img]
[img][/img]
[img][/img]
[img][/img]
[img][/img]
[img][/img]

[img][/img]

[img][/img]

[img][/img]

[img][/img]

[img][/img]

[img][/img]

[img][/img]

[img][/img]

0
-
I need help identifying this barrel. It is a 26' .410 Remington barrel. On the left side it is marked "410 GA. FOR 3 IN. PLASTIC SHELLS ONLY". On the right side it is marked: "REMINGTON ARMS CO. INC. ILLION, N.Y. MADE IN U.S.A." over: "PATENT NOS 2,645,873 - 2,675,638 - 2,719 - 375 - 3,200,710 - 3,201,886". Any info on Model & year of manufacture will be appreciated. 

0 -
It's a cut-down military rifle barrel. Krags, Springfields and Enfields all used 10 square TPI. The O.D. of the threads, might narrow it down. 0 -
EITHER 1903 SPRINGFIELD OR 1917 ENFIELD DEPENDING ON O.D. OF THE THREADS 0 -
1.050 outside diameter of the threads. 0 -
Has the look of been in a fire. 0 -
Springfield A3 0 -
Thanks v35. No Charlie, it has not been in a fire, just a lot of rust from poor storage. Will need polishing & bluing. Who manufactured the front sight? I have never seen one like it. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by Gunswapper
Thanks v35. No Charlie, it has not been in a fire, just a lot of rust from poor storage. Will need polishing & bluing. Who manufactured the front sight? I have never seen one like it.
The sight is home made. I wouldn't be putting any money, into polishing and bluing the barrel. Sandblast it. This causes the pitting to blend in, and be disguised. Than put it on flea bay.0 -
Thanks Rufe. I will either sandblast it or list as-is on GunBroker. I don't like Flea-Bay! 0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
9 comments