Ruth Ginsburg should resign from Supreme Court
Not only has Ginsburg made incredibly STUPID comments about the new POTUS but she has publicly stated SHE HAS NO INTENTION OF BEING IMPARTIAL TO THE NEW ADMINISTRATION.
Ginsburg should resign or be impeached. If nothing else she should recuse herself from any cases that might have a possible conflict of interest or where she can be proven to lack impartiality.
QUOTE:
Justice Ginsburg has publicly announced she has no intention of being impartial for the next administration - critical for a judge on a court that regularly is tasked with ruling for or against the executive branch and Department of Justice.
In other words, Justice Ginsberg has declared that her mind is already made up - years before trial arguments even begin.
Even more outrageous is her refusal to back down from the inflammatory statements. On Monday, she told CNN, "[Trump] is a faker. He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego . How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that."
It proves that Ginsburg willfully crossed an unprecedented ethical line, and isn't backtracking one bit.
The mainstream media even agrees she was out of line.
"Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has crossed way, way over the line" is the headline of a Washington Post piece by Daniel Drezner, who wrote a scathing editorial on the grossly inappropriate behavior by Ginsburg.
"This was a remarkably stupid and egregious comment for a sitting Supreme Court justice to make on the record. Say what you will about Justices Antonin Scalia, who died in February, or Clarence Thomas, but they never weighed in on presidential politics quite like this," Drezner writes. "The closest example I can find is that in January 2004, during an election year, Scalia went on a hunting trip with Vice President Dick Cheney. That action alone got legal ethicists into a lather."
https://thehornnews.com/op-ed-ruth-bader-ginsberg-resign/
Hummm, where are the ethical legal folks now ?? OH,, that's right they were right wing Democrats.
Personally, think she will resign.
Ginsburg should resign or be impeached. If nothing else she should recuse herself from any cases that might have a possible conflict of interest or where she can be proven to lack impartiality.
QUOTE:
Justice Ginsburg has publicly announced she has no intention of being impartial for the next administration - critical for a judge on a court that regularly is tasked with ruling for or against the executive branch and Department of Justice.
In other words, Justice Ginsberg has declared that her mind is already made up - years before trial arguments even begin.
Even more outrageous is her refusal to back down from the inflammatory statements. On Monday, she told CNN, "[Trump] is a faker. He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego . How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that."
It proves that Ginsburg willfully crossed an unprecedented ethical line, and isn't backtracking one bit.
The mainstream media even agrees she was out of line.
"Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has crossed way, way over the line" is the headline of a Washington Post piece by Daniel Drezner, who wrote a scathing editorial on the grossly inappropriate behavior by Ginsburg.
"This was a remarkably stupid and egregious comment for a sitting Supreme Court justice to make on the record. Say what you will about Justices Antonin Scalia, who died in February, or Clarence Thomas, but they never weighed in on presidential politics quite like this," Drezner writes. "The closest example I can find is that in January 2004, during an election year, Scalia went on a hunting trip with Vice President Dick Cheney. That action alone got legal ethicists into a lather."
https://thehornnews.com/op-ed-ruth-bader-ginsberg-resign/
Hummm, where are the ethical legal folks now ?? OH,, that's right they were right wing Democrats.
Personally, think she will resign.
0
-
An apology does not cancel out the original intent. 0 -
Need to start a go fund me program to pay for her PERMANENT move to New Zealand like she promised. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
Note the date, and the apology.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/14/politics/ruth-bader-ginsburg-i-regret-making-donald-trump-remarks/
Heard it the day Ginsburg made the announcement. Who cares ?? Ginsburg is NOT IMPARTIAL and to make it worse, lacks common sense and the ability to keep her mouth shut. Not someone who gets a vote on forming or interpreting the LAWS OF THE LAND.
Time to retire.0 -
Her vote can be challenged on every case that pertains to Trump or Fed action. 0 -
so increasing senility is not reason to unemploy her ?? 0 -
I am not familiar with the action it would take, and by who, in order to remove her from the court. I am convinced behond a shadow of a doubt that she does not belong on the supreme court, or in any court for that matter. 0 -
she needs put out to pasture
I know its a life position but they should be a age limit or a term limit also / then your done . like a lot I doubt the originator's of the rules gave a thought to the long life some have now with the aid of medicine .
the old bat is just hanging around for the feeling of power . she needs to be running the retirement home bingo game and get the hell out of the goverment0 -
quote:Originally posted by hobo9650
Her vote can be challenged on every case that pertains to Trump or Fed action.
Who can challenge her vote?0 -
get her to pizz off the klintons ..she will be in a box tomorrow...without autopsy, declared dead by a bozo 100 miles away, and certified a natural passing without confirmation 0 -
she was hanging on to let hillery get a chance to get another liberal to replace her, well that boat sailed nov 8th leaving her stranded on the dock. happy days are here again. i am hopeing trump gets to put 2-3 new faces on the SCOTUS. mr myopic. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by gruntled
quote:Originally posted by hobo9650
Her vote can be challenged on every case that pertains to Trump or Fed action.
Who can challenge her vote?
and who would they challenge it to? (Who is higher than the Supreme Court - in the United States government?)0 -
this statement will put a cloud over her every court judgement from here on out....unless she pulls an obama..."PRESENT" 0 -
quote:Originally posted by us55840
I doubt she will resign since Trump got elected.
She, like the news media, will attempt to disrupt anything the administration pushes & approves of......and I seriously doubt obama will quietly fade into the night either.
[}:)]
Doubtful anything Ginsburg does will be nearly as bad as the media in general. Personally hope she is required to vote on something Trump wants. That should be interesting.
What has happened in the past might be a good example of the future.
It's unclear if Ginsburg would recuse herself if ever called to judge a case involving Trump in the future. But a predecessor on the high bench who also commented on the presidential politics of the day provides an example.
Sandra Day O'Connor, then a Supreme Court justice, was heard at an election night party in 2000 calling the results "terrible" when CBS called Florida for Al Gore, according to Newsweek. After the comments were reported, she was criticized for having still voted when the case over Florida's contested election results eventually went to the Supreme Court.
She chose to join the majority in that case, which halted ballot recounting in Florida and eventually handed the presidency to George W. Bush.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article89308557.html
Notice: She was just heard to say !!!
Ginsburg had a media frenzy and was wearing her dissent "jabot" on Wednesday, one day after an incredibly divisive and contentious presidential campaign ended in the election of Donald Trump.
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/2016-election-day/justice-ginsburg-wears-dissent-collar-following-contentious-election-n681571[/url
]
A sure sign of senility coupled with an ego that's saying I'll do what I want !!!!0 -
The old hag has one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel The old barf bag will be dead soon anyway 0 -
Ginsburg states she would like to change the electoral college but it takes a constitutional amendment.
Another judge wishing to legislate from the bench.
VIDEO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3yhxep2hto
ARTICLE:
http://dailysignal.com/2017/02/08/what-ruth-bader-ginsburg-gets-wrong-about-the-electoral-college/0 -
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
"and to make it worse, lacks common sense and the ability to keep her mouth shut. "
[:D]
I'm Surprised You get it[^]0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
16 comments