Of these given two choices,which do you
prefer??
SFS
Decocking lever
SFS
Decocking lever
0
-
If SFS means Striker Fired System I would prefer that if we are discussing defensive handguns. [:)] 0 -
Yes I know what it is and Mr Laughridge and crew do excellent work. I was just funning you cause I prefer a Glock or other plastic gun for carry. If I was going to carry one of my 1911?s I would prefer to stay with the condition one carry, cocked and locked. You have two safeties engaged and that should be enough. I have trained enough that wiping off the thumb safety is natural to me and I prefer my triggers to remain constant. But if someone prefers the SFS that?s cool with me. 0 -
...so,I'll put you down for the de-cocking lever,, 0 -
i prefer which ever system is used on a smith & wesson model 19. 0 -
two more for the decocking lever,, 0 -
quote:Originally posted by GreatGuns
I enjoy carrying my Smith & Wesson model 410 in the winter, so another decocking lever fan here. [^]
[^][^][^]0 -
That SFS trigger look like an unnecessary over complicated add on to an already complex action that serves zero purpose.
Sooo another vote for a decocker.0 -
The SFS is only available on Single Action guns, not to mention that I don't see much of a difference between it and a normal safety. So, unless you're talking about single action pistols with decockers then wouldn't the more appropriate question be whether you prefer single or double action? 0 -
I prefer the safety fast shooting over the decocker. Because the 1911 is my favorite firearm. Although I am a traditionalist, and the safety fast shooting it's just that, a modification 0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2d-PGv7plcQ&t=583sPlease sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
10 comments