MSNBC's Maddow Starts Street Protests !
Looks like the left is reaching for the pitchforks and torches to storm the Bastille! The chaos may ensue soon!
serf
https://news.grabien.com/story-msnbcs-maddow-organizing-street-marches-protest-sessions-fir
This is a national emergency,? Miller said during an appearance on Deadline: White House. ?I don?t think you can overstate the gravity of the situation. And it?s incumbent upon everyone in public life to respond to this like it?s an emergency. This isn?t like all of Trump?s other attempts to interfere with the investigation. He?s reached over and found the one person among dozens of political appointees at the Justice Department who has a preordained hostility, publicly stated hostility to the investigation. I think for people in Congress, they need to step up and object to this. I think people ? the broad public, this is the time to maybe take to the streets and say this is not what you expect out of the government.?
serf
https://news.grabien.com/story-msnbcs-maddow-organizing-street-marches-protest-sessions-fir
This is a national emergency,? Miller said during an appearance on Deadline: White House. ?I don?t think you can overstate the gravity of the situation. And it?s incumbent upon everyone in public life to respond to this like it?s an emergency. This isn?t like all of Trump?s other attempts to interfere with the investigation. He?s reached over and found the one person among dozens of political appointees at the Justice Department who has a preordained hostility, publicly stated hostility to the investigation. I think for people in Congress, they need to step up and object to this. I think people ? the broad public, this is the time to maybe take to the streets and say this is not what you expect out of the government.?
0
-
the national emergency is an organized group spreading civil discord 0 -
Some unstable folks will take this too far, ANTIFA types. I suggest going nowhere unarmed. 0 -
Stupid is as stupid does...These dumb F..Ks are just pissing in the wind. The AG serves at the pleasure of the President...period
If Muller had anything on Trump it would already be out and all over the news...especially before the mid-terms.
Nothing but "Eye Wash".0 -
Madcow needs some hot blooded man on hear and pull the stroke to her. Maybe she will like men then and be a little happier. 0 -
Madcow, knew sooner or later someone would spell her name correctly.[:D]
Anyway, thought this would be about Acosta? Madcow came out of the gate a little early, not knowing there will be bigger fish to fry.
A more fitting name for Abilio Jim Acosta is plain ole, Jim Accoster.
Will madcow be guilty of inciting to riot? News outlets becoming mob leaders? Maybe MSNBC as a company can be held liable for her actions? Madcow's using their broadcasting with their permission.
Did the left finally figure out they lost the last election?0 -
I would say that rises to the level of Malice. 0 -
No surpise here, she is only one of many media sleazes inciting mob like behavior. This is what DEMOCRATs do. 0 -
Why can't they just be happy they won the House and some governors at the last election?
[:D]0 -
Suggest the lefties check some history. Supreme Court case brought by a DEMOCRAT President in 1926 settled whether the President can fire an officer of the Executive Branch.
"Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926),[1] was a United States Supreme Court decision ruling that the President has the exclusive power to remove executive branch officials, and does not need the approval of the Senate or any other legislative body."
Not that they would ever be troubled by facts.0 -
"Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926),[1] was a United States Supreme Court decision ruling that the President has the exclusive power to remove executive branch officials, and does not need the approval of the Senate or any other legislative body."
Stolen and pasted.0 -
"Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926),[1] was a United States Supreme Court decision ruling that the President has the exclusive power to remove executive branch officials, and does not need the approval of the Senate or any other legislative body."
Stolen and pasted.0 -
"Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926),[1] was a United States Supreme Court decision ruling that the President has the exclusive power to remove executive branch officials, and does not need the approval of the Senate or any other legislative body."
Stolen and pasted.0 -
"Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926),[1] was a United States Supreme Court decision ruling that the President has the exclusive power to remove executive branch officials, and does not need the approval of the Senate or any other legislative body."
Stolen and pasted.0 -
quote:Originally posted by hunter86004
"Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926),[1] was a United States Supreme Court decision ruling that the President has the exclusive power to remove executive branch officials, and does not need the approval of the Senate or any other legislative body."
Stolen and pasted.
Once would have been enough.0 -
Once would have been enough.
For God sakes this is not a complaint - but this is the only forum I visit that you can not hit the back button without reposting. I forget that myself from time to time.0 -
quote:Originally posted by US Military Guy
Why can't they just be happy they won the House and some governors at the last election?[:D]The Democrats have nothing to be happy about because they lost the election.
Trump has:
The Presidency
The Senate
SCOTUS
Federal Judges
The American People
Pelosi Has:
A small majority in the House.[:p]
EDIT: Many of the Republicans in the house weren't helping Trump. Less now but stronger Republicans, next election should be better.0 -
Seditious speech in the United States. ... The Brandenburg v. Ohio U.S. Supreme Court decision maintains that seditious speech?including speech that constitutes an incitement to violence?is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as long as it does not indicate an "imminent" threat.
It appears that perception of "imminent threat" is the key.0 -
i would say trying to force a door open is an immenent threat....tucker Carlson ...where were the police ???....damage my door in the middle of the night will get you some personal damage 0 -
quote:Originally posted by Arby
Stupid is as stupid does...These dumb F..Ks are just pissing in the wind. The AG serves at the pleasure of the President...period
If Muller had anything on Trump it would already be out and all over the news...especially before the mid-terms.
Nothing but "Eye Wash".
Bingo! When you have the FBI Director Comey as an admitted leaker, to the NY Times, you know damn well that if Mueller had anything it would have leaked long long ago.
Dems think they need to riot in the streets because the President fired an employee. Right.
Liberalism is a mental disorder.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Mobuck
Seditious speech in the United States. ... The Brandenburg v. Ohio U.S. Supreme Court decision maintains that seditious speech?including speech that constitutes an incitement to violence?is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as long as it does not indicate an "imminent" threat.
It appears that perception of "imminent threat" is the key.
This is exactly why I was not 100% on board for Kavanaugh. He relies on precedent. Precedent has nothing to do with what is right with regards to the constitution. Precedent is just someone elses opinion.0 -
quote:Originally posted by mag00
quote:Originally posted by Mobuck
Seditious speech in the United States. ... The Brandenburg v. Ohio U.S. Supreme Court decision maintains that seditious speech?including speech that constitutes an incitement to violence?is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as long as it does not indicate an "imminent" threat.
It appears that perception of "imminent threat" is the key.
This is exactly why I was not 100% on board for Kavanaugh. He relies on precedent. Precedent has nothing to do with what is right with regards to the constitution. Precedent is just someone elses opinion.
Seems exactly the opposite is true.
In leaked email, Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh challenged Roe v Wade precedent, and said 'Court can always overrule'
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/06/scotus-nom-brett-kavanaugh-challenged-roe-v-wade-precedent-said-court-can-always-overrule.html0 -
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
quote:Originally posted by serf
Looks like the left is reaching for the pitchforks and torches to storm the Bastille! The chaos may ensue soon!
serf
https://news.grabien.com/story-msnbcs-maddow-organizing-street-marches-protest-sessions-fir
This is a national emergency,? Miller said during an appearance on Deadline: White House. ?I don?t think you can overstate the gravity of the situation. And it?s incumbent upon everyone in public life to respond to this like it?s an emergency. This isn?t like all of Trump?s other attempts to interfere with the investigation. He?s reached over and found the one person among dozens of political appointees at the Justice Department who has a preordained hostility, publicly stated hostility to the investigation. I think for people in Congress, they need to step up and object to this. I think people ? the broad public, this is the time to maybe take to the streets and say this is not what you expect out of the government.?
As usual, you do not know what you are talking about, serf.
Did you do even the least bit of research as to who organized the protestors, and sent them into motion ?
Maddow, while obviously supporting them, did nothing to start them.
That was done by the organization that ....organized them.
If you have proof that Maddow is a member and controller of that organization, please post it.
Another talking head in the shadows there Barrzilla.Kind'a like the puppet shows in the 1700's with France when people could not read or write! She is an agitator for The Left and playing with fire.
serf0 -
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
quote:Originally posted by serf
Looks like the left is reaching for the pitchforks and torches to storm the Bastille! The chaos may ensue soon!
serf
https://news.grabien.com/story-msnbcs-maddow-organizing-street-marches-protest-sessions-fir
This is a national emergency,? Miller said during an appearance on Deadline: White House. ?I don?t think you can overstate the gravity of the situation. And it?s incumbent upon everyone in public life to respond to this like it?s an emergency. This isn?t like all of Trump?s other attempts to interfere with the investigation. He?s reached over and found the one person among dozens of political appointees at the Justice Department who has a preordained hostility, publicly stated hostility to the investigation. I think for people in Congress, they need to step up and object to this. I think people ? the broad public, this is the time to maybe take to the streets and say this is not what you expect out of the government.?
As usual, you do not know what you are talking about, serf.
Did you do even the least bit of research as to who organized the protestors, and sent them into motion ?
Maddow, while obviously supporting them, did nothing to start them.
That was done by the organization that ....organized them.
If you have proof that Maddow is a member and controller of that organization, please post it.
About as plausible as Hilly Dilly didn't know anything about her servers. GEEEZ US CHRIST, you are not even close to making a point other than how ignorant or completely blind you are, maybe both.0 -
Just in time for christmas looting [:D]. And more importantly getting some property damage in before winter. 0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
24 comments