Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Social Media Hate Speech Checks Before Gun Purchas

Comments

25 comments

  • shilowar
    Sounds like a leftist's wet dream..combining the suppression of the 1st and 2nd Amendments at the same time!! Only made possible by mandatory firearms registration.
    0
  • spasmcreek
    rather imagine one could NOT criticise ANYTHing without someone screaming...HATE...HATE....that offends me ...REVOKE his RIGHTS...common sense flies out another window
    0
  • Sam06
    This is my only Social Media outlet I participate in.


    If they stumbled on this place I would probably get an anal probe from the libtards[:0]
    0
  • Tech141
    Define "Hate Speech".

    I guarantee you one thing - It won't be the 'content' of the speech that will get a denial. It will be the personal bias of the Speech Reviewer.

    THIS is the exact government oppression Orwell warned us about.

    This is the EXACT reason the 2nd Amendment was included in the US Constitution.

    Every legislator who votes to pass this will be in Direct Violation of their Oath of Office, and needs to be removed, forcibly if required.
    0
  • fordsix
    is GB considered social media[^]
    0
  • mag00
    Look for it to be retroactive too. [:(!]

    "Lawmakers in New York have begun drafting legislation that would require potential gun owners to have the past three years of their social media reviewed before they were granted permission to own a firearm."

    I have my permission already...

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
    0
  • hillbille
    quote:Originally posted by Sam06
    This is my only Social Media outlet I participate in.


    If they stumbled on this place I would probably get an anal probe from the libtards[:0]


    +1, don't even own a cell phone, not that it would keep them from making one up if they wanted something on me bad enough, course if they asked the wife she would just tell em I was an Ahole........
    0
  • shilowar
    quote:Originally posted by fordsix
    is GB considered social media[^]


    More like socially unacceptable![:p]
    0
  • Rocky4winds
    quote:Originally posted by shilowar
    quote:Originally posted by fordsix
    is GB considered social media[^]


    More like socially unacceptable![:p]


    Or anti-social media.[:D]
    0
  • medic07
    I think this would lose on appeal to the SCOTUS. Clearly infringement of rights (both 1st and 2nd). Also can claim that the state is doing precognition policing by claiming you will be a threat because you used one the untold number of "key words" they will use.

    As Tech stated, there is no definition of what they will consider "hate speech" and it will be entirely up to the person doing the review.

    Also, how long will they have to complete these reviews? Younger people post upwards of 100 times a day (100x365x3 = 109,500 posts to look through)...yeah that will only take a few minutes.

    Then you need to see what others have posted on their social media and if that is considered "hate speech" and you did not remove it or report them then you will most likely be denied as well.

    I can see them going after key words such as:
    Terrorism
    Terrorist
    Constitution
    We The People
    The tree of liberty
    Give me liberty or give me death
    Molon Labe
    etc
    etc
    etc
    0
  • hillbille
    so if we are to start taking people at their word, or what they say, can we finally say goodbye to those hollyweirdos who were going to canada when Trump won, and make em GO..............
    0
  • Rocky Raab
    Some should offer an amendment that adds "or files for political office" to the bill. And watch the heads explode.
    0
  • droptop
    Hate speech will never get resolved / defined to everyone's satisfaction.
    0
  • wpage
    Well it is NY the hate capital of the US. Who defines the hate speech. Some left wing nut. Or would that be constituted as hate speech on my part?
    0
  • kimi
    What would really appear to screw their Nazi ideas up would be for such sites to dump such information daily.
    0
  • mogley98
    It is easy enough to maintain a alternate profile with a email not associated with your ISP God forbid your work might decide anyone who frequents a gun page might not be a quality employee.
    0
  • guntech59
    quote:Originally posted by wpage
    Well it is NY the hate capital of the US. Who defines the hate speech. Some left wing nut. Or would that be constituted as hate speech on my part?


    All I ever hear is people hating on NY. It would be a great place to live if we got rid of NYC.

    While I would not doubt that the NY Assembly could pass such a law, and that Cuomo would sign it in a heart beat, I don't think this will go anywhere. Of course, that's what I said about the SAFE Act, too. [:(!]
    0
  • minitruck83
    quote:Originally posted by Sam06
    This is my only Social Media outlet I participate in.


    If they stumbled on this place I would probably get an anal probe from the libtards[:0]



    They're here.
    (some of em even post) [V]
    0
  • mag00
    I hate Trump

    There, I'm covered. [:D]
    0
  • kidthatsirish
    Sounds like the thought police to me.
    0
  • kannoneer
    From whatI have seen, the Democrats post by far the most vile, hateful comments possible. They hate the Right in general and President Trump in particular.
    0
  • chiefr
    If you are talking about partisan FB and Twitter, their need be no laws.
    Both are willing to sell their soul to advance the DEMOCRAT party's antigun agenda.

    Like any other DEMOCRAT party front group, both FB and Twitter are partisan and crooked. They are already censoring opposition. They are selling and giving away personal information... and if it advances their far left agenda they could care less if they get caught.

    Would not surprise me at all if they go as far as making things up or outright lying about members if it keeps evil guns out of peoples hands. Look at what DEMOCRATS have done to the media. Look at what these people did to Kavanaugh. I for one avoid these sewers.
    0
  • Wulfmann
    quote:Originally posted by fordsix
    is GB considered social media[^]


    I believe they will mandate anyone on GB, AR15, Glock and Sig talk sites etc will automatically be unable to purchase a firearm and must surrender theirs immediately

    Wouldn't it be nice if they ordered that and LE said we won't but good luck with doing it yourself and do let us know so we can get lawn chairs and popcorn and place our wagers
    I know enough cops like beating up people no matter what excuse but I can dream they all have morals
    0
  • spasmcreek
    the GIANT NSA data center in Utah monitors phone and computer traffic
    & already has all us on file ....bet me...George Orwell had it right
    0
  • droptop
    quote:Originally posted by spasmcreek
    the GIANT NSA data center in Utah monitors phone and computer traffic
    & already has all us on file ....bet me...George Orwell had it rightWhat the government doesn't have, Google / Facebook / Twitter have the rest, and more.
    Here is all the data Facebook and Google have on you
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/28/all-the-data-facebook-google-has-on-you-privacy

    Checkout where you've been today, yesterday or ???? They have this and much/much more.
    Only YOU can see this data, >>>>lolol.gif
    https://myactivity.google.com/myactivity
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity