Social Media Hate Speech Checks Before Gun Purchas
In NY, coming to the Pacific rim states.
Lawmakers Propose Social Media Hate Speech Checks Before Gun Purchases
awmakers in New York have begun drafting legislation that would require potential gun owners to have the past three years of their social media reviewed before they were granted permission to own a firearm.
Eric Adams, the president of Brooklyn Borough, and state Senator Kevin Palmer are currently writing the proposed legislation, which would give law enforcement authorities the power to check up to three years of an individual?s social media accounts and internet search history before they are allowed to buy a gun, WCBS Newsradio 880 reported. One of the main aims is to identify any hate speech shared by the users, as the politicians noted that such offensive comments are generally only discovered after mass shootings occur.
https://www.newsweek.com/lawmakers-propose-hate-speech-social-media-checks-gun-purchases-1200746
Was it a contest to see how many constitutionally protected rights they could violate in one action?
Lawmakers Propose Social Media Hate Speech Checks Before Gun Purchases
awmakers in New York have begun drafting legislation that would require potential gun owners to have the past three years of their social media reviewed before they were granted permission to own a firearm.
Eric Adams, the president of Brooklyn Borough, and state Senator Kevin Palmer are currently writing the proposed legislation, which would give law enforcement authorities the power to check up to three years of an individual?s social media accounts and internet search history before they are allowed to buy a gun, WCBS Newsradio 880 reported. One of the main aims is to identify any hate speech shared by the users, as the politicians noted that such offensive comments are generally only discovered after mass shootings occur.
https://www.newsweek.com/lawmakers-propose-hate-speech-social-media-checks-gun-purchases-1200746
Was it a contest to see how many constitutionally protected rights they could violate in one action?
0
-
Sounds like a leftist's wet dream..combining the suppression of the 1st and 2nd Amendments at the same time!! Only made possible by mandatory firearms registration. 0 -
rather imagine one could NOT criticise ANYTHing without someone screaming...HATE...HATE....that offends me ...REVOKE his RIGHTS...common sense flies out another window 0 -
This is my only Social Media outlet I participate in.
If they stumbled on this place I would probably get an anal probe from the libtards[:0]0 -
Define "Hate Speech".
I guarantee you one thing - It won't be the 'content' of the speech that will get a denial. It will be the personal bias of the Speech Reviewer.
THIS is the exact government oppression Orwell warned us about.
This is the EXACT reason the 2nd Amendment was included in the US Constitution.
Every legislator who votes to pass this will be in Direct Violation of their Oath of Office, and needs to be removed, forcibly if required.0 -
is GB considered social media[^] 0 -
Look for it to be retroactive too. [:(!]
"Lawmakers in New York have begun drafting legislation that would require potential gun owners to have the past three years of their social media reviewed before they were granted permission to own a firearm."
I have my permission already...
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."0 -
quote:Originally posted by Sam06
This is my only Social Media outlet I participate in.
If they stumbled on this place I would probably get an anal probe from the libtards[:0]
+1, don't even own a cell phone, not that it would keep them from making one up if they wanted something on me bad enough, course if they asked the wife she would just tell em I was an Ahole........0 -
quote:Originally posted by fordsix
is GB considered social media[^]
More like socially unacceptable![:p]0 -
quote:Originally posted by shilowar
quote:Originally posted by fordsix
is GB considered social media[^]
More like socially unacceptable![:p]
Or anti-social media.[:D]0 -
I think this would lose on appeal to the SCOTUS. Clearly infringement of rights (both 1st and 2nd). Also can claim that the state is doing precognition policing by claiming you will be a threat because you used one the untold number of "key words" they will use.
As Tech stated, there is no definition of what they will consider "hate speech" and it will be entirely up to the person doing the review.
Also, how long will they have to complete these reviews? Younger people post upwards of 100 times a day (100x365x3 = 109,500 posts to look through)...yeah that will only take a few minutes.
Then you need to see what others have posted on their social media and if that is considered "hate speech" and you did not remove it or report them then you will most likely be denied as well.
I can see them going after key words such as:
Terrorism
Terrorist
Constitution
We The People
The tree of liberty
Give me liberty or give me death
Molon Labe
etc
etc
etc0 -
so if we are to start taking people at their word, or what they say, can we finally say goodbye to those hollyweirdos who were going to canada when Trump won, and make em GO.............. 0 -
Some should offer an amendment that adds "or files for political office" to the bill. And watch the heads explode. 0 -
Hate speech will never get resolved / defined to everyone's satisfaction. 0 -
Well it is NY the hate capital of the US. Who defines the hate speech. Some left wing nut. Or would that be constituted as hate speech on my part? 0 -
What would really appear to screw their Nazi ideas up would be for such sites to dump such information daily. 0 -
It is easy enough to maintain a alternate profile with a email not associated with your ISP God forbid your work might decide anyone who frequents a gun page might not be a quality employee. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by wpage
Well it is NY the hate capital of the US. Who defines the hate speech. Some left wing nut. Or would that be constituted as hate speech on my part?
All I ever hear is people hating on NY. It would be a great place to live if we got rid of NYC.
While I would not doubt that the NY Assembly could pass such a law, and that Cuomo would sign it in a heart beat, I don't think this will go anywhere. Of course, that's what I said about the SAFE Act, too. [:(!]0 -
quote:Originally posted by Sam06
This is my only Social Media outlet I participate in.
If they stumbled on this place I would probably get an anal probe from the libtards[:0]
They're here.
(some of em even post) [V]0 -
I hate Trump
There, I'm covered. [:D]0 -
Sounds like the thought police to me. 0 -
From whatI have seen, the Democrats post by far the most vile, hateful comments possible. They hate the Right in general and President Trump in particular. 0 -
If you are talking about partisan FB and Twitter, their need be no laws.
Both are willing to sell their soul to advance the DEMOCRAT party's antigun agenda.
Like any other DEMOCRAT party front group, both FB and Twitter are partisan and crooked. They are already censoring opposition. They are selling and giving away personal information... and if it advances their far left agenda they could care less if they get caught.
Would not surprise me at all if they go as far as making things up or outright lying about members if it keeps evil guns out of peoples hands. Look at what DEMOCRATS have done to the media. Look at what these people did to Kavanaugh. I for one avoid these sewers.0 -
quote:Originally posted by fordsix
is GB considered social media[^]
I believe they will mandate anyone on GB, AR15, Glock and Sig talk sites etc will automatically be unable to purchase a firearm and must surrender theirs immediately
Wouldn't it be nice if they ordered that and LE said we won't but good luck with doing it yourself and do let us know so we can get lawn chairs and popcorn and place our wagers
I know enough cops like beating up people no matter what excuse but I can dream they all have morals0 -
the GIANT NSA data center in Utah monitors phone and computer traffic
& already has all us on file ....bet me...George Orwell had it right0 -
quote:Originally posted by spasmcreek
the GIANT NSA data center in Utah monitors phone and computer traffic
& already has all us on file ....bet me...George Orwell had it rightWhat the government doesn't have, Google / Facebook / Twitter have the rest, and more.
Here is all the data Facebook and Google have on you
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/28/all-the-data-facebook-google-has-on-you-privacy
Checkout where you've been today, yesterday or ???? They have this and much/much more.
Only YOU can see this data, >>>>
https://myactivity.google.com/myactivity0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
25 comments