Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Telescopic stabilizing brace

Comments

10 comments

  • tsavo303
    yes its legal and they work well
    stupid atf agrees their sloppy definitions allow it
    same as the 14" shotguns that aren't
    0
  • select-fire
    Not extended in pic but works great 7.5" 7.62x39. Very noisy. 1 dead coyote to date at 100 yd. Vortex strike fire red dot.

    100-1235.jpg
    0
  • shilowar
    You're referring to the SB SBA3 brace i assume. I have one on my Colt Commando P, and it runs off a carbine buffer tube.
    UiicS1T.jpg?1
    0
  • redneckandy
    I have an SBA3 brace but I am confused to how it is legal. I thought the buffer tubes on pistols could not accept a rifle stock and the SBA3 uses a standard six position tube.
    0
  • Grasshopper
    Got a "brace-stock" like that on my Evo. So cool looking, love it. [:)]
    Found an article on Siri that the ATF reconsidered it in 2017, as far as I know it is ok.?[?]
    0
  • shilowar
    quote:Originally posted by redneckandy
    I have an SBA3 brace but I am confused to how it is legal. I thought the buffer tubes on pistols could not accept a rifle stock and the SBA3 uses a standard six position tube.




    It is because the design is not "intended" to be used as a shoulder stock...it is a brace. At present, misuse of a brace does not change the design.
    0
  • redneckandy
    quote:Originally posted by shilowar
    quote:Originally posted by redneckandy
    I have an SBA3 brace but I am confused to how it is legal. I thought the buffer tubes on pistols could not accept a rifle stock and the SBA3 uses a standard six position tube.




    It is because the design is not "intended" to be used as a shoulder stock...it is a brace. At present, misuse of a brace does not change the design.

    I agree with that. The buffer tube is my issue, it was originally designed for a stock.
    0
  • shilowar
    quote:Originally posted by redneckandy
    quote:Originally posted by shilowar
    quote:Originally posted by redneckandy
    I have an SBA3 brace but I am confused to how it is legal. I thought the buffer tubes on pistols could not accept a rifle stock and the SBA3 uses a standard six position tube.




    It is because the design is not "intended" to be used as a shoulder stock...it is a brace. At present, misuse of a brace does not change the design.

    I agree with that. The buffer tube is my issue, it was originally designed for a stock.


    You can use a carbine buffer tube on a pistol...so long as you don't have a shoulder stock attached to it.
    0
  • Marc1301
    quote:Originally posted by shilowar
    quote:Originally posted by redneckandy
    quote:Originally posted by shilowar
    quote:Originally posted by redneckandy
    I have an SBA3 brace but I am confused to how it is legal. I thought the buffer tubes on pistols could not accept a rifle stock and the SBA3 uses a standard six position tube.




    It is because the design is not "intended" to be used as a shoulder stock...it is a brace. At present, misuse of a brace does not change the design.

    I agree with that. The buffer tube is my issue, it was originally designed for a stock.


    You can use a carbine buffer tube on a pistol...so long as you don't have a shoulder stock attached to it.


    Yep,...beat me to it.
    0
  • rufe-snow
    Just bought one of the SBA3 Stabilizing Braces, from Optics Planet. Same same, as the one in the local gun store, that specializes in AR's, parts and accessories.

    Don't get me wrong. I buy local, when ever I can. But 100 bucks is to much to ignore. For that much difference, I gave Optics Planet the business.

    Just hope they come through, though? I have ordered stuff off their site in the past. Without them actually having it in stock. It really pissis me off. When they have stuff, listed on their web site. But send you a e-mail saying it's out of stock. And you will have to wait for them, to replenish their inventory.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity