Custer Battlefield Relic SAA Colt
Pretty dang cool if it's for real, and it looks like it most likely is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLwhVePvFeM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLwhVePvFeM
0
-
That is pretty cool, but I'm sure somebody's going to want to have it destroyed because it's racist...[V] 0 -
OK, why wouldn't you have that done by a pro? That could be a very pricy piece of iron. 0 -
Sold at auction for 33 grand. 0 -
Now that's cool.
Maybe he is,the pro.0 -
OK, WTH is that clown doing with a sander/grinder? GEEEZZZ ,,I can't believe what he done.. [B)][xx(][V][|)] 0 -
Custer personally carried a pair of large pinfire revolvers made in Belgium...
But his officers and noncoms would have had the issue option of a colt SAA revolver from a known narrow specific serial number range (well documented)
Still an interesting item to many collectors
BTW relics and artifacts attributed to the little bighorn battle site are often fakes and reproductions meant to deceive - it's a prolific counterfeiting cottage industry
Mike0 -
I have done some pretty touchy restorations and I would have to see this done in person to authenticate it. I don't like the idea of using Nitric acid for this because Nitric eats both rust and the steel. However nitric will eat the less dense steel more so than the compressed or stamped numbers. Or visa versa. Phosphoric acid works better because it eats primarily the iron oxide rather than the steel.
I would not have started off grinding on this but would have used the phosphoric acid first. Just my opinion.0 -
As far as I am concerned no rusty old guns is worth more that $10, I don't care where it came from. I have seen more shotguns marked Wells Fargo than Wells Fargo ever had.
Caveat Emptor.
Anyone in the market for a really good suspension bridge?0 -
33k
what a great pay day for hours ? of work and research
good for him
great find but proves again some people have Too much money0 -
It's been illegal to "pick up" anything off the battlefield for decades. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by guns-n-painthorses
OK, why wouldn't you have that done by a pro? That could be a very pricy piece of iron.
If you watched the video, you would realize that he is a jeweler. Although he doesn't work with firearms, he he does know and have the techniques to clean precious metals. So why wouldn't he do it himself?0 -
Nonsense. Could have belonged to the Indians after the battle. 0 -
If I read it the right way the relic was found in 1933 so the legalities most probably differed greatly from the framework of regulations we have today...
Ex post facto rule of law probably applies
Or statute of limitations and criminal liability
And when did the territory achieve statehood status
Just some points for consideration
Mike0 -
quote:Originally posted by remingtonoaks
quote:Originally posted by guns-n-painthorses
OK, why wouldn't you have that done by a pro? That could be a very pricy piece of iron.
If you watched the video, you would realize that he is a jeweler. Although he doesn't work with firearms, he he does know and have the techniques to clean precious metals. So why wouldn't he do it himself?
Because, jeweler and firearm restore are still two diff things. imo, you make a mistake and , well you f'ed it up.0 -
As I understand it, there is no documentation on "Custer Colts." Only a serial range that includes many more guns than were actually present and really doesn't confirm that a particular gun was carried into battle at the Little Big Horn. 0 -
That book said 7047 was dug up on the Custer battlefield. How long has the federal government considered it a landmark? No digging allowed. That hunk of metal could have been found anywhere and the story is a lie to increase value. 0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
16 comments