Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Reader's Digest.

yoshmyster
Found one of these, too. Didn't know they still made these either. A lot thinner and not pulpy like I remember. Maybe that's why they're thinner? I don't think these makes good emergency TP. Things might just slick over and not grab.
0

Comments

16 comments

Date Votes
  • Ricci Wright
    They have a quilted version as well as. Large print version.
    0
  • Ricci Wright
    Sorry I just checked and the quilted version is not on the Cal DOJ list.
    0
  • spasmcreek
    mostly ads now anyway....slick paper, slick ads....no joy
    0
  • truthful
    Gave up on RD several years ago when it went to mostly ads, and content became boring. The worst was in every issue the article listing "13, or 30, or 100 Things ______ won't tell you." Totally made up crap.
    0
  • Rocky Raab
    Some 40 years ago, it was a very high honor to have something published there, because the selection process was so intense. Probably no longer such an accomplishment.
    0
  • gruntled
    I remember when they were so proud that they didn't have ads. They did do one great service to the country. They printed a long article about what happened at Chappaquiddick when Ted Kennedy was running for President. That took the wind out of his sails.
    0
  • gruntled
    I remember when they were so proud that they didn't have ads. They did do one great service to the country. They printed a long article about what happened at Chappaquiddick when Ted Kennedy was running for President. That took the wind out of his sails.
    0
  • gruntled
    Not only did the post double but this time I can't even delete it.
    0
  • Brookwood
    The best thing about Reader's Digest is that there are still millions of OLD copies out there to be had.

    Priced from free to nearly free, and still some good reading.[:)]
    0
  • spasmcreek
    did readers digest get sold to another agenda somewhere along its line it changed ..when i moved into my grandads home after he died there was every old issue back to the beginning..first ones had no ads and now one gets snippets of articles amongst a sea of irrelevant ads in a much thinner issue
    0
  • yoshmyster
    I sat down and started to flip through it and I didn't recognize what I was looking at. The old stuff had stories, right? This seemed more like a "Lunch Time Survey". I wonder if I'll recognize National Geographics?
    0
  • spasmcreek
    NG has changed since Murdoch? bought it..first thing he did was fire a load of people and REMOVE the readers questions and response section ...you are to purchase it and SHUT UP... and have noticed some issues promoting a political agenda like a recent one concerning black America and how they have been so abused..when my current subscriprion is up it is out the door...so is Time magazine...get straight info from--The Week-- and Smithsonian
    0
  • kannoneer
    I used to like the Reader's Digest first-person stories about how someone had survived some calamity- earthquake, fire, car crash, plane crash, etc. Also had the condensed book story in the back. Several pages of jokes and general 'life in the US' type stuff. Don't know what they have now; haven't read one for 20 years or more.
    But I own some going back almost 60 years and they have plenty of ads in them.
    0
  • gruntled
    quote:Originally posted by kannoneer
    I used to like the Reader's Digest first-person stories about how someone had survived some calamity- earthquake, fire, car crash, plane crash, etc. Also had the condensed book story in the back. Several pages of jokes and general 'life in the US' type stuff. Don't know what they have now; haven't read one for 20 years or more.
    But I own some going back almost 60 years and they have plenty of ads in them.

    When Digest executives decided in 1955 to accept advertising, 33 years after its first issue, they prohibited selling space on the back cover, which at other publications is a highly prized --
    I am surprised it was that long ago, I would have guessed it was much more recent.
    0
  • sxsnuf
    I remember when cable tv was commercial free, because you PAID for it.
    Now, I PAY a cable company to inundate me with commercials, many promoting the Happyagenda or the plight of the disadvantaged minorities.
    Any of the magazines I pick up today will be at least 75% advertizing.
    Can't even escape the ads on my favorite websites, but at least those are free.
    0
  • bobski
    I go by RD in chapaqua ny on my way home. I shoot trap just a few blocks from their HQ.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity