Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania And Wisconsin At US Supreme Court Over Election
I wonder if they will pick this up for review much less ligated it but we will see.
serf
Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.…
This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.
-
This whole thing stinks to high heaven.
We all pretty much knew all the stops would be pulled out for Election Fraud this particular Election. (Well, it was/and it has.) What is going to be done about it, remains to be seen.
I am disgusted, and disillusioned with our Democratic process for Electing a POTUS. I believe most Law Abiding American's are as well. We have been scammed, and we all know we have been scammed. If this BS stands, stick a fork in us.
0 -
@...: 31548130428315/comments/31548146301211
This whole thing stinks to high heaven.
We all pretty much knew all the stops would be pulled out for Election Fraud this particular Election. (Well, it was/and it has.) What is going to be done about it, remains to be seen.
I am disgusted, and disillusioned with our Democratic process for Electing a POTUS. I believe most Law Abiding American's are as well. We have been scammed, and we all know we have been scammed. If this BS stands, stick a fork in us.
The whole world is on the agenda and Trump was not playing ball with them. That is why they must circumvent what is left of judo-christian beliefs to establish trans humanism NWO with a g_d less governor now. In God We Trust is just a slogan now.
Science has and will replace g-d to many converts with Trans humanism and proclaim we are not superstitious anymore.
serf
0 -
The left is already trying to discredit Paxton for filing this. As I understand it, this State vs State suit goes straight to the SCOTUS, no lower court dismissals.
0 -
Just heard the Supreme Court has rejected Trump's Pennsylvania lawsuit.. looks like Biden gets it..
0 -
Yep rubber stamped! "This ship has sailed." & The Supreme Court is behind The NWO 100% in my opinion. They have washed their hands just like with Pilate did with Christ. Next, Gun confiscation with assault weapons being deemed not guarantee under the 2nd amendment in The Bill of Rights.
But they have one last chance with The Texas lawsuit still I think.
@...: 31548130428315/comments/31548146664091
Just heard the Supreme Court has rejected Trump's Pennsylvania lawsuit.. looks like Biden gets it..
serf
After waiting over a year to challenge Act 77, and engaging in procedural gamesmanship along the way, they come to this Court with unclean hands and ask it to disenfranchise an entire state," they wrote. "They make that request without any acknowledgment of the staggering upheaval, turmoil, and acrimony it would unleash."
0 -
MY wife told me a short time ago
several more states ( named them but I do not remember them al )l and maybe more joining Texas in the suit also asking people to call there state and push for them to sign on with the group
what I gather the SCOUS did not refuse the lawsuit just holding off possible to put them all together
if that fails well the crap will hit the fan and the monkeys will flinging the poo for sure
0 -
Under the Constitution, states with legal complaints against other states have a right to sue them in the Supreme Court without first going through a lower court, but they need a majority Justices’ consent to do so. Arguments over water rights is one of the more typical law suits between states. If the court denies a motion to file, that ends the case. If the Court allows the lawsuit, the case unfolds just as any lawsuit would in with the gathering of evidence to present at a trial. The Court customarily farms this out to an individual known as a “special master” who gathers the evidence and recommends a decision for the Justices to consider.
Keep in mind that the states being sued have the right to oppose the motion to file the lawsuit, and to defend against it. This entire matter could take months, or even years to resolve. In the meantime, Trump is out, Biden can't be sworn in, and Pelosi becomes President.
0 -
mark christian: 31548130428315/comments/31548162534555
Under the Constitution, states with legal complaints against other states have a right to sue them in the Supreme Court without first going through a lower court, but they need a majority Justices’ consent to do so. Arguments over water rights is one of the more typical law suits between states. If the court denies a motion to file, that ends the case. If the Court allows the lawsuit, the case unfolds just as any lawsuit would in with the gathering of evidence to present at a trial. The Court customarily farms this out to an individual known as a “special master” who gathers the evidence and recommends a decision for the Justices to consider.
Keep in mind that the states being sued have the right to oppose the motion to file the lawsuit, and to defend against it. This entire matter could take months, or even years to resolve. In the meantime, Trump is out, Biden can't be sworn in, and Pelosi becomes President.
But the court has to give restitution to the suing states if they won.right? Like a free stolen election token or something in 2024? (Green Font)
It's dictator time!
serf
0 -
mark christian: 31548130428315/comments/31548162534555
Under the Constitution, states with legal complaints against other states have a right to sue them in the Supreme Court without first going through a lower court, but they need a majority Justices’ consent to do so. Arguments over water rights is one of the more typical law suits between states. If the court denies a motion to file, that ends the case. If the Court allows the lawsuit, the case unfolds just as any lawsuit would in with the gathering of evidence to present at a trial. The Court customarily farms this out to an individual known as a “special master” who gathers the evidence and recommends a decision for the Justices to consider.
Keep in mind that the states being sued have the right to oppose the motion to file the lawsuit, and to defend against it. This entire matter could take months, or even years to resolve. In the meantime, Trump is out, Biden can't be sworn in, and Pelosi becomes President.
With all due respect, Mark, this is not correct.
Article 2, Section 1, and Amendment 12 state the following:
(Taken from the 12th)
...The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice...
So, should the electors from these four states not be seated, and Biden therefore does not reach 270, the election will be thrown to the House where each state gets but a single vote. Currently the make up of House, though controlled by the democrats, consists of a majority of Republican controlled delegations Therefore, were all delegations to vote along party lines, the disqualification of these four swing states would potentially result in a majority vote for Trump in the House.
There is no path to a Pelosi Presidency absent the near concurrent deaths or disability of the sitting POTUS and VPOTUS.
3 -
Thank God.
3 -
I stand corrected.
0 -
Texas is now supported by Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Tennessee.
serf
3 -
This suit is going exactly nowhere. Even if it does, the result would be (at best) "do better next time". Anyone holding to hope this is going to give Trump a victory is delusional.
3 -
mark christian: 31548130428315/comments/31548144664347
I stand corrected.
I admire the heck out of a man that will take public correction, standing on his own 2 feet with his chin held high.
Well done. This is what Leaders look like.
6 -
Mr. Perfect: 31548130428315/comments/31548144937243
This suit is going exactly nowhere. Even if it does, the result would be (at best) "do better next time". Anyone holding to hope this is going to give Trump a victory is delusional.
The election laws that bind our Union was violated and The legislators should have known long before allowing this to happen. Either They do a new election or there will be a very deep trouble for us all. It's the only answer that would address the process to be fair and unadulterated. Any other way is sheer stupidity.
This is not about 3 counties in Florida the last time The supreme court ruled on the election,it's much more at stake here this time. Bet on it.
serf
0 -
serf: 31548130428315/comments/31548164123419
https://forums.gunbroker.com/discussion/comment/11236084#Comment_11236084
The election laws that bind our Union was violated and The legislators should have known long before allowing this to happen. Either They do a new election or there will be a very deep trouble for us all. It's the only answer that would address the process to be fair and unadulterated. Any other way is sheer stupidity.
This is not about 3 counties in Florida the last time The supreme court ruled on the election,it's much more at stake here this time. Bet on it.
serf
You probably still believe Hillary will be tried for her emails or that Obama will do time for Fast and Furious.
3 -
Just read that now it is up to 17 states that have joined the suit. Will the SCOTUS refuse to hear the case? Roberts cannot be trusted, so if it is he alone that decides ........
0 -
thought I heard on radio they announced early afternoon they would hear the case, not sure when though.......
0 -
This may very well be the most important Decision that SCOTUS ever gets involved in. Our Country is at a Constitutional Crossroads. Thankfully with one (with another 17 signing on.) State suing another four States over a Constitutional issue, SCOTUS has NO CHOICE but to get involved and hear it and make a decision. The only way they will not/can not do that, is if a "Special Master" assigned by SCOTUS finds a lack of evidence to hear the case. That would be a tragedy of the Highest Order.
Evidence seems to be mounting.
This issue NEEDS to go to SCOTUS for a decision. Anything less will be an abrogation of their duties IMHO.
Things are going to get VERY interesting here shortly. One way or the other about 74 million (+/-) Americans are about to gets seriously disenfranchised.
0 -
They stole the election right in front of the world and think they will get by with it...and probably will...sad times..
0 -
And they just denied it.... hello swamp...
0 -
scous just proved how deep the BS runs
basic told the people go pound sand
I am just amazed with all the states signed on all evidence and swore statements and politicians even signing on and the
all knowing and great court declares who we looked to to stand up for the right thing to do sorry bout your luck
we are are screwed so many ways
0 -
Cheating seems to be the best way to win anymore... being honest gets you nowhere fast....oh-well bye-bye bang bangs I guess..
0 -
Just another stab in the back for the elites to get us in order for The NWO take over. Biden probably will sail through any tight spots with The China investigation and begin free trade with them again with technology advances if they play ball in The U.N.
Say bye bye to your gun rights too. The private use of military type weapons will be curtailed then banned in short order. Don't look for The Supreme court to interpret the 2nd amendment other than for sporting use only like a shotgun or single shot deer rifle in the end. A pistol will be limited to ten rounds too.
serf
0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
24 comments