Electronic vote fraud equation revealed?
Can Trump's team of lawyers really put off the election of JoeBiden?
serf
Electronic vote fraud equation revealed: In Michigan in 4 counties 138,000 Fake votes for Biden « JoNova
Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, an MIT engineer and Fulbright Scholar, with Phil Evans B.S.E.E. and Benny Smith (election commissioner and data analyst) have back-analyzed the pattern of voting in Michigan and figured out the electronic algorithm used to alter votes.
A “Transistor Function” algorithm has been used to alter voting patterns in Michigan. It has a “Weighted Race” feature.
Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, an MIT engineer and Fulbright Scholar, with Phil Evans B.S.E.E. and Benny Smith (election commissioner and data analyst) have back-analyzed the pattern of voting in Michigan and figured out the electronic algorithm used to alter votes. Voting patterns are distorted in a way that can only be explained by a linear transformation (an algebraic equation) and he can approximate that equation and slope of the line. This means he can calculate how many votes were flipped and he does, and it’s massive.
This one form of fraud alone is enough to flip the election to Biden. That’s without all the postal vote backdating, the dead people voting, the out of state votes, the discarded ballots, the crooked media coverups, the pollsters fakery and the Pfizer hiding of the Covid Vaccine news. Trump won the election despite all the other trickery. If there had been real media coverage, honest vaccine headlines, exposure of Hunter Biden and honest polling the election probably could have been called by 8pm on Election day.
The action analysis starts at 13:30 minutes.
In disconcerting news, votes are stored as a decimal fraction. They are not even trying to record votes as whole numbers, as individual choices.
-
Ummmmm no. Anyone with the slightest knowledge of differential equations can model anything. And of course votes are stored as floating point in the database. Faster math and smaller space requirements.
0 -
Electronic voting should be outlawed period! It was proven during the 2000 election how easy it was for programmers to alter vote tallies on the machines.
6 -
"Ummmmm no."
Ummmmmm, YES. Regardless of equations or floating points, it's quite possible to use hidden computer controls to begin altering input after a set number or ratio is reached.
The election was stolen using electronic voting alterations and mail in ballot stuffing.
0 -
You don't need diffeqs to model something as simple as fudging counts that have patterns. It's child's play.
3
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
4 comments