Skip to main content
Thank you for your patience as we work through our high volume of requests. If you need assistance with 2FA, please provide the correct phone number in your ticket request so we can assist quicker.
Help Center Community Shop

IBM Will Deliver a 1000 Qubit Quantum Computer by 2023

Comments

14 comments

  • chiefr
    Predicted
    0
  • Ricci.Wright
    Oh My God!!!
    0
  • serf
    Oh My God!!!

     More like the son of perdition. Then G-d my friend.
                             serf
                     
    0
  • Ricci.Wright
    Dude how do you get out of bed in the morning?? 
    0
  • serf
    Dude how do you get out of bed in the morning?? 
      It's easy no problem but I realize that we live in exciting times. This new invention will be out of this world and be able to try to predict the future and very well could & would & it could be Kabbala science.   https://kabbalahcenter.net/kabbalah-science/
                                       serf
    Right now, constraints on computing power mean the team's simulator can look at only 16 possible futures at once. One day, however, as quantum computers become larger, more powerful and more commonplace, simulators like this one could be expanded to see infinitely many futures at once, Gu said. This could aid in things like weather prediction or making more-informed investments in the stock market. It could even help improve machine learning, which is all about artificial intelligence teaching itself to make better and better predictions.


    0
  • BikerBob

    So in other words you’re saying it could tell us the definitive answer to the 9mm vs. the 45 debate and let us know if remote girl has an older, available sister?

    3
  • nononsense
    Beware Skynet. :D;)
    0
  • serf
    nononsense said:
    Beware Skynet. :D;)
      Was not Putin right and if so are not all major countries striving to be first to be in charge of the world's first omnipotent
      quantum computer with artificial intelligence. The election here is just a side show compared what's on  the horizon.
                                    serf

         

    Russian President Vladimir Putin says that whoever reaches a breakthrough in developing artificial intelligence will come to dominate the world.

    Putin, speaking Friday at a meeting with students, said the development of AI raises “colossal opportunities and threats that are difficult to predict now.”

    He warned that “the one who becomes the leader in this sphere will be the ruler of the world.”

    https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2020-01-31/google-quantum-chief-warns-china-can-quickly-develop-supercomputers

    Several countries are in this race. President Donald Trump signed a bill in 2018 that officially earmarked $1.2 billion for quantum information development in the next decade. Last year, Google claimed it overtook Chinese efforts and developed a machine that can solve a problem in just 200 seconds, which would take a supercomputer today about 10,000 years.

    Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Russia, Japan and South Korea are also looking into the supercomputers of tomorrow and pouring large sums of money into research and development.





    0
  • Don McManus
    The world will come to an end.

    Odds are it will not be a super-duper computer that does it.
    0
  • serf
    The world will come to an end.

    Odds are it will not be a super-duper computer that does it.
      That's is exactly why we are in the position we are in now. And a super-duber computer may be what saves us this time around ie Wuhan virus cure. You got one of those super dumber computers already,It's your brain. Cause the problem and bring the solution however it is an evil game,coming and going. Believe it or not.
                                        serf

    0
  • serf
    us55840 said:
    I have no idea what all that gibberish is or means and really, don't much care.
     B) 

     Ignorance is bliss your choice,not mine. It Is not gibberish it's science they say?
                                serf

    0
  • RobOz
    can it make kielbasa and sauerkraut?
    0
  • serf
    RobOz said:
    can it make kielbasa and sauerkraut?
      It will do everything according to this expert and we will become obsolete.You can go finger paint or play golf everyday and not worry about anything but the wife when you come home. :) This is based on conventional computers technology,Quantum computing A.I. will be a demi-god and vastly superior with enough power to predict future events in nature from what I read.
                                              serf
          https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/11/03/1011616/ai-godfather-geoffrey-hinton-deep-learning-will-do-everything/


    I do believe deep learning is going to be able to do everything, but I do think there’s going to have to be quite a few conceptual breakthroughs. For example, in 2017 Ashish Vaswani et al. introduced transformers, which derive really good vectors representing word meanings. It was a conceptual breakthrough. It’s now used in almost all the very best natural-language processing. We’re going to need a bunch more breakthroughs like that.

    And if we have those breakthroughs, will we be able to approximate all human intelligence through deep learning?

    Yes. Particularly breakthroughs to do with how you get big vectors of neural activity to implement things like reason. But we also need a massive increase in scale. The human brain has about 100 trillion parameters, or synapses. What we now call a really big model, like GPT-3, has 175 billion. It’s a thousand times smaller than the brain. GPT-3 can now generate pretty plausible-looking text, and it’s still tiny compared to the brain.





    0
  • Nanuq907
    Make all the super duper fast computers you want.  They are no better than the software they run.  Consider the gargantuan failures of the coronavirus models and the climate models.  Toss those models onto a quantum computing machine and it just gives you the same wrong answers, faster.  Sure, add more variables.  You introduce more errors because nobody anywhere has the slightest clue what the initial conditions or boundary conditions should be.  Think "butterfly effect".  Make the software "self healing" so it can detect its own errors and poor judgments for rejection.  It's still subject to the select/reject parameters of the person who wrote it.  Make those parameters fungible.  The parametric models that alter the parameters are still modeled after the perceived ethics of the people who coded it.  Unless you know of a mutually agreeable source of ethics we can all adopt as a reference?  The flawed human short-sighted solution is simply achieved faster.  It's still broken.
    The future is owned by people who can code on bare metal.  Everything else is in the layers.  Luckily there are background checks and continuous security audits of the people who keep the important systems working.  Luckily most of us are patriots.  Luckily most of us agree with "first do no harm".  Luckily there are enough old silverbacks still around to convey to the next class of snot-nosed punks that they don't know dick.  Of that class we might retain 0.5% that are up to the job.  We start their training and on it goes.
    3

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?