Skip to main content
Thank you for your patience as we work through our high volume of requests. If you need assistance with 2FA, please provide the correct phone number in your ticket request so we can assist quicker.
Help Center Community Shop

Amy Coney Barrett

Comments

19 comments

  • bustedknee
    It is easier to pronounce than Darth Bader Gin-drinker 
    0
  • Ricci.Wright
    One hell of a lot better looking too.
    0
  • Alpine
    For those that haven't she is Trump's choice for the Supremes.
    3
  • Rocky Raab
    Allegedly. As being reported by that bastion of objectivity, CNN.
    0
  • cbxjeff
    Now the fun begins.
    0
  • BobJudy
    Rocky Raab said:
    Allegedly. As being reported by that bastion of objectivity, CNN.
    We have to remember Trump is a master of misdirection. Get the dems digging for information on her and then name someone else. Bob
    3
  • Mr. Perfect
    Rocky Raab said:
    Allegedly. As being reported by that bastion of objectivity, CNN.


    0
  • chiefr
    She can be the most pious and honest nominee ever, but since she was nominated by Trump, get ready to watch the massive hate filled diatribes and intense character assassination launched by the dirty filth media and their DEMOCRAT handlers .
     Don't doubt me.
    0
  • kimi
    I'd like to see the North Carolina or Arizona lady picked.
    0
  • Butchdog2
    GO TRUMP!!!
    3
  • 4205raymond
    Go Trump!!!
    0
  • nmyers
    I'm a single issue voter.  That issue is:  the Second Amendment.
    I don't know what firearms cases Mrs Barrett has been involved with, or decisions she has made.  We were fooled by Roberts, Gorsuch, & Kavanaugh, who talked like they were strict Constitutional supporters.  I don't want to be fooled again.  Her selection was awful fast.
    Neal
    0
  • BobJudy
    nmyers said:
    I'm a single issue voter.  That issue is:  the Second Amendment.
    I don't know what firearms cases Mrs Barrett has been involved with, or decisions she has made.  We were fooled by Roberts, Gorsuch, & Kavanaugh, who talked like they were strict Constitutional supporters.  I don't want to be fooled again.  Her selection was awful fast.
    Neal
    Not a lot to go on, but she looks promising.
    https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/hints-of-judge-amy-coney-barretts-stance-on-gun-rights-look-promising/
    Bob
    0
  • Horse Plains Drifter
    What Neal said.
    0
  • Nanuq907
    chiefr said:
    get ready to watch the massive hate filled diatribes and intense character assassination launched by the dirty filth media and their DEMOCRAT handlers .
    I can attest to that.  The things they said against my Sarah were way, way, WAY over the top.  They accused her of incest, to explain her Down Syndrome baby.  People like that shouldn't be allowed to walk the earth.  At least not with two functioning knees.
    0
  • kimi
    She will be good for the court, I'd think.
    0
  • Butchdog2
    Trying to find out as much about her as I can. I agree, she will make one of the best.
    0
  • Don McManus
    Posted in another thread, but worth re-posting for this one.

    As BobJudy noted, she looks very promising.





    https://newrepublic.com/article/159512/amy-coney-barrett-wants-felons-guns-not-votes

    From the link:

    The lone dissenting judge was Barrett. In a 38-page dissent, she argued that history and practice from the founding era showed that the Framers did not intend to deny gun ownership to all felons, just those who could be dangerous. “Neither Wisconsin nor the United States has introduced data sufficient to show that disarming all nonviolent felons substantially advances its interest in keeping the public safe,” she wrote. “Nor have they otherwise demonstrated that Kanter himself shows a proclivity for violence. Absent evidence that he either belongs to a dangerous category or bears individual markers of risk, permanently disqualifying Kanter from possessing a gun violates the Second Amendment.”

    Federal appeals courts are bound to follow the Supreme Court’s precedents in any given case. But when it comes to the Second Amendment, those precedents are far from settled. In the 2008 case D.C. v. Heller, the court ruled for the first time that the Second Amendment protected an individual right to bear arms unrelated to any militia function. Two years later, in McDonald v. Chicago, the court held that the Second Amendment’s protections also apply to state laws. The two decisions marked a sea change in how the courts interpreted the right to bear arms and cast doubt on a wide swath of gun-related restrictions nationwide.

    Comment:

    By incorporation through Due Process, Heller and McDonald have transformed the 2nd Amendment (substantially) into a collective right.  In the highlighted section above, Barrett has succinctly expressed the individual liberty ensconced in the 2nd Amendment, and puts her on a much higher plain than her mentor, Scalia.



    0
  • KenK/84Bravo

    Pro-Life, Pro-2nd Amendment?

    Pro Amy Coney Barrett.

    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?