Space X 4.30 Eastern
Going back into space with Astronauts...
0
-
Godspeed, gentlemen.
A pretty dang amazing achievement.0 -
I have a great view from my office.
It rained last night and this morning and still cloudy.
0 -
I can't wait to watch this launch!
10 years of overpaying the Russians to do the job the we should have been doing all along. Thank you Obammy! $90 million per seat each way up and back.Well, not any more! Space-X and Boeing (choke) will now step up to handle both the resupplies and astronaut switching.
Best.0 -
Update at 1:00 pm Eastern: The rocket is in good shape, with no mechanical issues being worked, the astronauts are suiting up and will board in about an hour, After they are sealed in, there will be a Go-No-Go poll to start fueling, final weather checks (it is iffy but improving) and then launch at 4:33 pm. Watch it on NASA TV, History Channel, Discovery Channel, or at spacex.com 0 -
Touchscreen panels ect. ect. Thing looks like more like Star Trek Enterprise. Warp factor 8 Scottie. 0 -
At least SpaceX doesn't have to deal with the hand-wringers in Congress if something goes bad. They can go back to the drawing board and fix it and not wait on the liberal boo hooers to approve another flight. 0 -
Trump will be at the preview. 0 -
I realize they are trying to save money on the space suits but I wish they had at least put some red, white and blue strips on them or some kind of design. They look like city sewer workers in HAZMAT suits getting ready to go into a confined space. Those helmets looked like they were designed by the guy that made the face mask for the horror movie Scream. 0 -
Oh well they just called off the mission today due to weather. 0 -
Darn! They just scrubbed the launch.... 0 -
It was a field mill violation. That means too much lightning potential. Next try Saturday at 3:22 pm Eastern. 0 -
Flying Clay Disk said:"They" said it couldn't be done...and Space X successfully landed a primary rocket booster on a barge."They" said it couldn't be done...and Space X successfully landed TWO primary rocket boosters simultaneously on a pad in FL.
"They" said it couldn't be done...and Space X docked a privately funded commercial space vehicle with the ISS."They" said it couldn't be done...and Space X developed a Space Suit which costs a fraction of NASA's suits."They" said it couldn't be done...and Space X developed a viable commercial space program for a fraction of the cost of NASA."They" said it couldn't be done...and today we will watch as Space X returns man to space on a US made rocket.Say what you will about Elon Musk and Space X, but they've sure put a lot of "they's" in fear of their jobs!What will "they" say about Space X...tomorrow?
Exactly FCD. NASA should not exist as a government entity.3 -
Saturday..try again 0 -
nononsense said:I can't wait to watch this launch!
10 years of overpaying the Russians to do the job the we should have been doing all along. Thank you Obammy! $90 million per seat each way up and back.Well, not any more! Space-X and Boeing (choke) will now step up to handle both the resupplies and astronaut switching.
Best.
Yep, chalk up another one for ole Big Ears.
Apparently some of Big Ears kin folks were not into the political Space kickback schemes, unless it was with the Russians. (the Russians that helped Trump get elected and shot down Hillary)0 -
Okie, it is going to shock a whole bunch of people to learn than when the Boeing craft starts flying, it'll cost at least $110 million - that's per launch, not per seat, though. AND, they'll be using the Atlas booster, which is a throw-away rocket that uses Russian engines. So we'll still be paying Russia to launch astronauts with the Boeing design. 0 -
Hopefully a green light today 0 -
Make America Great again and this Time President Trump is pulling it off! May The force be with us!serfThrough divine providence God accomplishes His will. To ensure that His purposes are fulfilled, God governs the affairs of men and works through the natural order of things. The laws of nature are nothing more than God’s work in the universe. The laws of nature have no inherent power; rather, they are the principles that God set in place to govern how things normally work. They are only “laws” because God decreed them.0 -
Looks like a go in 10 minutes!0 -
Missing hear you count it down Rocky!
0 -
Well everything was going good and then they supposedly lost the feed to the landing of the 1st stage on the barge at the very second it landed? That's going to be raising some questions. Did it really happen? 0 -
WooHoo! What a ride! Forget those Holly 4 barrels, I want one of those. 15000 mph. Nasa with the help of Spacex is back, screw the Russians. Bob 0 -
Smitty, they almost always lose the uplink at booster landing because the rocket exhaust moves the barge's transmit antenna dish. And they lose the camera link from the booster just before that because it goes beneath the horizon from the Cape tracking station. Nothing mysterious or sneaky about either. 0 -
this launch was as exiting as the first moon launch as a kid yahoo 0 -
Landed perfectly on the barge.... Let the world see how we can do things. 3 -
Then I look forward to seeing the recording instead of the live feed since it didn't knock the camera out.Rocky Raab said:Smitty, they almost always lose the uplink at booster landing because the rocket exhaust moves the barge's transmit antenna dish. And they lose the camera link from the booster just before that because it goes beneath the horizon from the Cape tracking station. Nothing mysterious or sneaky about either.
0 -
That was, I think, the 51st or 52nd successful barge landing, plus almost a dozen on land back at the Cape. They missed a few for various reasons, all malfunctions of one kind or other but of the 83 Falcon9 launches to date, they've landed something like 60 of them successfully. Which is 60 more than any other entity that launches. (I'm not counting Space Shuttle solid boosters, which were recovered, but you can't say they landed under control except under parachutes.) 0 -
I'm not really interest in the other 51 successful landings. I just want to see this one. 0 -
Excellent job. Beautiful it was. 0 -
Hmmm... I distinctly recall on a recent launch they said they were hoping to make the 50th landing on a single booster's fifth flight, both milestones. And they missed it. They've flown at east one - with a good landing - since then. Disparity of number aside, NObody else has manged even one. I think that's one major reason why SpaceX will get a lot more crewed launch missions than Boeing (assuming they get their problems fixed well enough to fly any at all) -- they're going to be cheaper. A LOT cheaper. Even though NASA is willing to pay a premium to get new boosters each time from SpaceX and remain unwilling to fly crews on previously flown boosters, SpaceX is still going to cost something like one fourth Boeing's launch cost.
NASA will still pay for Boeing's system, though. We've learned the very hard way that having only one flyable system is a huge mistake.
0 -
The downside of quoting from memory at age 73 is that anything more than 40 years ago is crystal clear, but stuff from 40 days ago is as murky as spring runoff in the Mizzipi River.
As for the 737, the regular version is just fine. It's the MAX that they tried to foist off as the same plane while in reality they ought to have given it a whole new designation and paid for the type approval of such. They thought they could outsmart the system because the Max looks a lot like the 737. But it isn't the same thing at all. I'll still happily fly a regular 737, but the Max is likely doomed to never fly passengers again.
0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIZsnKGV8TEPlease sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
38 comments