Skip to main content
Thank you for your patience as we work through our high volume of requests. If you need assistance with 2FA, please provide the correct phone number in your ticket request so we can assist quicker.
Help Center Community Shop

Comments

47 comments

Date Votes
  • dreher
    I hope the actions of these unamerican commie a holes was burned into the retinas of millions of Americans and will be remembered in November!!  With the way the demoncraps have acted is it to much to hope for to have the biggest landslide in history sweeping Trump, the Senate and the House into historic levels!! 
    0
  • savage170
    agree  but doubt it will happen
    0
  • hillbille
    we can only pray so, but I fear she is almost as untouchable a hilldabeast........    I wouldn't care if shifty took over, but I do like the part about removal from office and not being allowed to hold office afterwards
    0
  • mac10
    test pilot from a broom factory
    3
  • montanajoe
    • Community moderator
    Numerous things she could/should be charged with,,,
    3
  • CaptFun
    No need for witnesses either.  It was on live TV  
    0
  • Ditch-Runner
     my wife has been arguing she will be charged with destruction of a federal document among other charges 
     my take sadly it  will be like a klinton issue  nothing to see here move on 
    it would be so much fun too see charges brought up and her removed as chairman for behavior unbecoming ,, but the left will be erecting monuments and a day in history for standing up to the president . 
    0
  • Mr. Perfect
    The notion that ripping up a copy of a speech rises to the level of criminal is hilarious.
    0
  • chiefr
    DEMOCRATs and their slimy sycophants in the media prove themselves over and over they are nothing but a hate filled mob.   
    0
  • KenK/84Bravo
    Mr. Perfect: 31535376444443/comments/31535418542747
    The notion that ripping up a copy of a speech rises to the level of criminal is hilarious.

    Perhaps you missed the OP.

    0
  • Mr. Perfect
    ","bodyRaw":"The notion that ripping up a copy of a speech rises to the level of criminal is hilarious.
    ","format":"wysiwyg","dateInserted":"2020-02-06T01:03:08+00:00","insertUser":{"userID":383873,"name":"Mr. Perfect","photoUrl":"https:\/\/us.v-cdn.net\/6031683\/uploads\/userpics\/697\/nA6MO6FMMJ9MJ.jpg","dateLastActive":"2020-02-06T01:12:42+00:00","label":"✭✭✭"},"displayOptions":{"showUserLabel":false,"showCompactUserInfo":true,"showDiscussionLink":false,"showPostLink":false,"showCategoryLink":false,"renderFullContent":false,"expandByDefault":false},"url":"https:\/\/forums.gunbroker.com\/discussion\/comment\/11154990#Comment_11154990","embedType":"quote"}"> https://forums.gunbroker.com/discussion/comment/11154990#Comment_11154990

    Perhaps you missed the OP.


    You would be wrong.
    0
  • KenK/84Bravo

    What a "Perfect," response.

    0
  • Mr. Perfect

    What a "Perfect," response.


    Please tell us all what precedent there is for criminalizing ripping up a copy of a speech?  Care to cite to some case law?  What exactly is the penalty and how does the cited US code apply?
    0
  • KenK/84Bravo

    Deep breaths Mr Perfect. Deep breaths. (Again) Please refer to the OP. It may, (or may not) answer your questions. Research it for yourself if you care to. If not, that is fine also.

    0
  • Mr. Perfect

    Deep breaths Mr Perfect. Deep breaths. (Again) Please refer to the OP. It may, (or may not) answer your questions. Research it for yourself if you care to. If not, that is fine also.


    As I figured. You have exactly nothing of substance to add, just personal attacks. Carry on thy way, won't you now?
    0
  • hillbille
    my understanding is those speeches are signed and given to congress during the speech, then are supposed to be turned over to the national archives for proper storage.  not official enough????
    0
  • buddyb
    She is in the -See you in Toledo-category.
    3
  • bullshot
    The Republicans should do NOTHING, this asinine display of childishness and disrespect should and will stand on it's own for a looooooooong time, no reason to respond in kind and stoop to that level of school yard mentality.  Just let that light shine Nancy, you're opening a lot of eyes.
    0
  • KenK/84Bravo

    Perhaps you missed the fact that your answers are contained in the OP. There were no "personal attacks," levied. I tried to answer your question, you chose not to look in to the statute, that Capt. Fun cited in his OP. You can do your own research on the statute. (Or not.)

    0
  • CaptFun
    The notion that ripping up a copy of a speech rises to the level of criminal is hilarious.
    The copy that is handed to the Speaker at the SOTUS is the Official Document that is destined for the archives.  It is not just another printout it is the Official Document.  That is the issue.  I know that was not on the PE exam,  but geez...  try to keep up. :D    
    3
  • Mr. Perfect
    CaptFun said:
    The notion that ripping up a copy of a speech rises to the level of criminal is hilarious.
    The copy that is handed to the Speaker at the SOTUS is the Official Document that is destined for the archives.  It is not just another printout it is the Official Document.  That is the issue.  I know that was not on the PE exam,  but geez...  try to keep up. :D    

    Capt, I've seen this thing posted in other places. It's absurd, and I'm surprised you've latched on to it.  This is the sort of nonsense word nut daily would publish. Do you have some credible critical analysis I've missed?
    0
  • jimdeere
    When someone gives you the finger, it’s equally asinine to give them one back.
    0
  • CaptFun
    CaptFun said:
    The notion that ripping up a copy of a speech rises to the level of criminal is hilarious.
    The copy that is handed to the Speaker at the SOTUS is the Official Document that is destined for the archives.  It is not just another printout it is the Official Document.  That is the issue.  I know that was not on the PE exam,  but geez...  try to keep up. :D    

    Capt, I've seen this thing posted in other places. It's absurd, and I'm surprised you've latched on to it.  This is the sort of nonsense word nut daily would publish. Do you have some credible critical analysis I've missed?
    As absurd as the whole Demoncrat Kangaroo court?  They referenced no code, presented no actual evidence and provided no witnesses.  This is actually a law and there is video evidence of her violating it.  What is so absurd.   Barr should hound her relentlessly until she resigns or is found guilty. 
    9
  • Mr. Perfect
    CaptFun said:
    CaptFun said:
    The notion that ripping up a copy of a speech rises to the level of criminal is hilarious.
    The copy that is handed to the Speaker at the SOTUS is the Official Document that is destined for the archives.  It is not just another printout it is the Official Document.  That is the issue.  I know that was not on the PE exam,  but geez...  try to keep up. :D    

    Capt, I've seen this thing posted in other places. It's absurd, and I'm surprised you've latched on to it.  This is the sort of nonsense word nut daily would publish. Do you have some credible critical analysis I've missed?
    As absurd as the whole Demoncrat Kangaroo court?  They referenced no code, presented no actual evidence and provided no witnesses.  This is actually a law and there is video evidence of her violating it.  What is so absurd.   Barr should hound her relentlessly until she resigns or is found guilty. 

    Yes, quite possibly that absurd. Calling what went on "Kangaroo court" does a disservice to actual kangaroo court proceedings by the comparison, but I digress. Yes, there is federal code that governs destruction of official documents. I've seen exactly zero critical analysis that would suggest it applies to a copy of a speech handed to the Speaker.  Further that anything beyond some inconsequential monetary fine would seem inappropriate.

    And since we have some Olympian skill level conclusion jumpers on this forum: no, I don't think that vile hag should get away with anything, but let's be serious. This is an absurd application of the law.
    0
  • CaptFun
    Sorry Mr. P.  Guess you joined the left coast team.  Nothing left to see here.  

    bye.
    6
  • select-fire
    Maybe the Donald will address it today at 12 . Now that would certainly be karma
    0
  • discusdad
    i predict here shortly that a move to oust Nutsy Pelosi as SOH will begin.   there are plenty of Senators sniping at her right now,  and with the House minority not getting anything done to their liking,  she will bear the brunt of a big shakeup.her days of power are numbered
    0
  • select-fire
    UpDate...


    6
  • mogley98
    Some of the left wing media pundits are jumping in to defend her that it wasn't a protected document. Perhaps it was or wasn't I don't know. I do know that anyone like her should not be in a position of power representing or pretending to represent Americans
    3
  • Rocky Raab
    The Constitution requires a State of the Union report, which becomes part of the Congressional Record. Pelosi was given the official archival copy of that document, which she destroyed. Such an act clearly violates Federal statute. I do not understand what some people do not understand about that.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?