Cut down 1917 Colt?
Looks to me that the barrel was cut. It was then nickle plated over rust (front sight.)
0
-
A lot of folks with money but no knowledge of what they are bidding on. I would have dropped out when the bidding hit $100. 0 -
Hmm, over 575 and they can't have a clue. My gosh, I know what to do if I see one. 0 -
Well, nowhere did he state the finish was original. Everything he said was basically true, although I don't know if an Army 1917 Colt is rare. It has no collectors value, but it may be worth that for a big bore carry gun. 0 -
That should instigate some interesting discussion at the next "Wanna see my US military gun collection?" meeting. 3 -
0 -
Gee, you would think the missing part of "United States Property" would raise some questions. 0 -
I Googled "Colt 1917 snub nose and found dozens of pictures of a snub nosed version 1917 although, none with a front sight like that one.
0 -
Yeah, one would think.BobJudy said:Gee, you would think the missing part of "United States Property" would raise some questions.0 -
Somebody wanted it awful bad. 0 -
Bubba did good. 0 -
I don't know if I'd pay $575.00 for that gun. It is pretty well done though. I probably would.bullshot said:I Googled "Colt 1917 snub nose and found dozens of pictures of a snub nosed version 1917 although, none with a front sight like that one.
0 -
I have noticed similar things happening at our local shows, (we have had a run of shows, over the last couple of months). Folks asking crazy prices, for run of the mill stuff. With no collectors value, and selling it. Seems way to many folks, have fell off the turnip wagon with a pocket full of dinero. Landed on their noggins, and got a wild urge to acquire a gun. 0 -
....Obvious it was cut. I "think" the barrel length for the Army Colt was 5 1/2" or 6" with the target model barrel being a bit longer. Kinda different back then for a combat revolver to be chambered in 45acp instead of 45lc, when "bigger is better" was in its hay-day...
0 -
"1918 RARE NICKLE PLATED NO RESERV"kannoneer said:Well, nowhere did he state the finish was original. Everything he said was basically true, although I don't know if an Army 1917 Colt is rare. It has no collectors value, but it may be worth that for a big bore carry gun.
LEADING statement,imo, why not put refinished in nickle? Don't care but imo, not the correct for a business title.0 -
That is a good looking Model 99. 0 -
If it went low enough it could have been a candidate for a Bubba Fitz Special. Nothing to lose in this condition. 0 -
Well, I guess when you figure most 1917 Colts were blued it can be said that finding one in nickle is "rare". Ruined, but rare.Grasshopper said:
"1918 RARE NICKLE PLATED NO RESERV"kannoneer said:Well, nowhere did he state the finish was original. Everything he said was basically true, although I don't know if an Army 1917 Colt is rare. It has no collectors value, but it may be worth that for a big bore carry gun.
LEADING statement,imo, why not put refinished in nickle? Don't care but imo, not the correct for a business title.
0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
18 comments