The gun has a crack in it
S&W Model 29-3 6" Nickel 44 Magnum Revolver - Revolvers at GunBroker.com : 891915095
Buy S&W Model 29-3 6" Nickel 44 Magnum Revolver: GunBroker is the largest seller of Revolvers Pistols Guns & Firearms All: 891915095
Buyer gives F feedback and says:
Schumajo A(6)
02/24/2021
Gun has crack not representative of gun do not purchase anything from buyer it is very hard to see in photos....
Response (left on 02/26/2021):
There is NO crack in the gun. It is the side plate seam where the side plate and frame meet. There is no reason to rate me a F when there is nothing wrong with the gun,.
-
LOL what a retard.
12 -
Buyers should have to pass an I.Q. test before they can bid. Said in my best Bugs Bunny impression, "What a maroon". Bob
0 -
There's yer sign.........
6 -
Maybe he will take it to a S&W authorized dealer for repair. That should make the Dealers day.
6 -
Oh my GOD!!! I just checked and all of my revolvers are cracked!!!!
15 -
Another failed to ask the wife for permission to bid.
12 -
That is a shame....I think I will contact the poor guy and offer him 100 bucks for that defective firearm. You know, Just to help him out 🙄
6 -
I had someone call me in a tizzy over a crack in their gun.....I quickly realized it was the plate area they were talking about. They hung up and I never heard from them again. Sometimes these F feedbacks give you the opportunity to reply and post what a moron they are for everyone to see.
6 -
Moron is not an endangered species.
9 -
That Smith looks as bad as Ricci's Smith and Wesson.
6 -
Capitalism works for morons as well as the rest of us undoubted geniuses.
0 -
it too bad about the pistol think what it could have sold for with out the crack ..
I agree with above post the wife said no way
3 -
Butchdog2: 31515900043931/comments/31515929431323
Another failed to ask the wife for permission to bid.
... mom
0 -
Its really interesting. You would expect someone winning a gun like that is a seasoned collector. And therefore has some fundamental knowledge if what they are buying.
Times have changed.
3 -
I posted a Smith & Wesson Model 64 for sale. One close-up photo showed the recoil shield, and a sharp-eyed potential bidder asked me if there were a crack in the recoil shield. I didn't think there was, or I would not have put the gun up for sale.
So, I got the gun in hand, and carefully examined it. Sure enough, there was a horizontal crack in the lower part of the recoil shield. What might have caused it is anyone's guess. I am inclined to believe it is a defect in the original frame forging or casting, whatever S&W uses.
I ended the auction and the gun is with Smith & Wesson now. We'll see how they want to handle this. Here is a picture of the crack. Strange, ain't it?
3 -
Now thats a crack!
0 -
Machine finish on that looks terrible
0 -
select-fire: 31515900043931/comments/31515901560859
Machine finish on that looks terrible
It is difficult to get a good finish on cracked material.
😂
3 -
I would have thought that quality control would have spotted those machine marks even if the crack wasn't easily detectable.
0 -
cbxjeff: 31515900043931/comments/31515914177819
I would have thought that quality control would have spotted those machine marks even if the crack wasn't easily detectable.
Agreed. Basic machining is a 125 finish. That is no where close
0 -
If you got a S&W with a crack, (some folks call that a side plate), just get out your handy dandy Mig/Tig welder and fix the darn thing.
9 -
David Nunn: 31515900043931/comments/31515930741659
I posted a Smith & Wesson Model 64 for sale. One close-up photo showed the recoil shield, and a sharp-eyed potential bidder asked me if there were a crack in the recoil shield. I didn't think there was, or I would not have put the gun up for sale.
So, I got the gun in hand, and carefully examined it. Sure enough, there was a horizontal crack in the lower part of the recoil shield. What might have caused it is anyone's guess. I am inclined to believe it is a defect in the original frame forging or casting, whatever S&W uses.
I ended the auction and the gun is with Smith & Wesson now. We'll see how they want to handle this. Here is a picture of the crack. Strange, ain't it?
https://us.v-cdn.net/6031683/uploads/QK93OCJUEKFU/dsc02434-jpg.jpg
Did S&W agree to replace the frame?
0 -
Or just a little J-B Weld, bpost.
3 -
The gripe about the side plate seam ranks down there with the guy who complained about the rings inside the cylinder chambers. He said the gun had been fired so much the steel was cut in the chambers! Don't these guys have any other revolvers to compare them to?
The guy who caught the flaw on Nunn's gun DID know what he was talking about. I have never seen a frame crack there before and S&W should easily see it is a manufacturing defect. Hope they still have some Model 64 frames on hand.
0 -
Gun has crack not representative of gun do not purchase anything from buyer it is very hard to see in photos....
There's just so much going on in that sentence.
1) do not purchase from buyer???
2) how is a crack (were there one) able to be representative of the gun?
3) the crack is hard to see because there isn't one.
4) there are multiple detailed photos, you can literally see everything even whether or not there are small cracks (there aren't)
0 -
bpost: 31515900043931/comments/31515888557979
https://forums.gunbroker.com/discussion/comment/11260343#Comment_11260343
Did S&W agree to replace the frame?
No. Not yet, anyway. They sent an emailed receipt for the gun, but that's all I've gotten from them so far.
A while back, I had a 642 that had a crack in the frame beneath where the barrel screws in. The hole where the barrel goes was apparently drilled off-center, and when the barrel was turn in, it actually cracked the frame and a little bit of the barrel was visible through the crack. For that one, Smith & Wesson just sent me a new one. And, they gave me a choice of lock or no lock! I chose no lock, of course!
3
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
26 comments