Kenosha riots- Kyle Rittenhouse
Anyone following this Rittenhouse trial? It's looking more and more like this should have never come to trial. Dude he shot just testified he pointed his gun at Kyle before Kyle shot him. LOL. The guy was a witness for the prosecution. LEWLZ!
Jeez, I feel bad Kyle has had to go through this kangaroo circus.
-
@...: 30633337173275/comments/
He wasn't needed there, he wasn't wanted there, no one asked him to be there.
He was nothing more than a disillusioned child. A child that made the biggest mistake of his life.
What about the guy who attacked Kyle who was legally barred from owning a gun, yet was carrying a pistol... the guy you seem to be supporting for attacking Kyle, "because Kyle was a child and shouldn't have been there"? Should that guy have been there? Seems to me that guy was the one that made the mistake. You don't think Kyle should have defended himself against his attack? Odd.
12 -
@...: 30633337173275/comments/
He wasn't needed there, he wasn't wanted there, no one asked him to be there.
He was nothing more than a disillusioned child. A child that made the biggest mistake of his life.
Exactly , his defense was he was guarding the car lot. Bologna... the owner never ask him to be there.. and by the way... was there any compensation? News just said he shot one in the back. That doesn't sound like a threat. I would assume he is was charged with 2 counts of murder and 1 count of attempted murder. He may pass on one but all three.. get real. And if the families of the deceased are in court... well good luck going on with your life.
0 -
@...: 30633337173275/comments/
Still patiently waiting for those of you that would happily support your 17 yr. old son taking off with a rifle and going out of town to assist others in time of need, during a riot, looting, and arson event.
This is your chance to show your support for just such a situation...............😋
Now let's see that show of hands............
He made, a dumb choice. Dumber people assaulted him. I would prefer my son be him rather than the people he shot.
24 -
He was there because he choice to be there, still a free country to travel as we please. He broke no laws. He had a god given right to defend him self, regardless of his age or where he was at. There are such things as mature 17 year olds. I have know people in there 30s and 50s that acted like 12 years olds. 17 to 18 is a legal guide line for law. It has really nothing to do with maturity.
21 -
I watched the medical examiner's testimony and watched the enhanced video that accompanies it. Saying the shot in the back proves he shot someone that wasn't a threat to him doesn't hold water. Quite frankly one has to ignore the situation entirely to come to that conclusion. The issue is still was he justified in shooting at all, that's it. He ran from the guy and was chased across a parking lot. He turned and shot the guy point blank as the guy was closing on him. You can watch the video.
18 -
Ironic he was the only one doing any killing.
0 -
How so ?
0 -
select-fire: 30633337173275/comments/30633586376475
Ironic he was the only one doing any killing.
Because he stopped 3 others from killing him and others.
12
Post is closed for comments.
Comments
98 comments