Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Military ICBM/nuke question??

Comments

10 comments

  • select-fire

    News... if you can believe any media said they had 1400 operational nukes.

    0
  • chme

    At the breakup of the USSR, the US sent crews there to help them get an inventory of what they had. They did not have current records on all their nuke ordnance. In a few cases there were mobile ICBM launchers that had been abandoned- crew had not been paid in months- they had parked the launchers, taken their AK-74s, and gone hunting for food.

    The missiles DO require maintenance- and so do the warheads. One component of a modern large nuke is tritium gas- which has a half-life of about 12 years. Has to be replaced or you get a low order nuke detonation. Electronics have to be serviced. Batteries need service. The conventional HE that starts the nuke detonation have to be serviced. The solid fuel rocket motors have to be serviced.

    Would SOME of them fly? Probably. But not all of them. In the words of Dirty Harry- "You have to ask yourself- do you feel lucky/'

    If they fly, would there be response? Very probably- and IMHO, the response has been much better kept.

    0
  • jimdeere

    In my opinion, it would only take one ICBM to insure mutually assured destruction.

    9
  • Nanuq907

    Problem is, President Peanut head would dither and try to sidestep. "Did they really meeeeean to press the launch code? Did they intend to... Was it just miscommunicatio...oh look! Ice cream!"

    12
  • buddyb

    They have subs,we have subs.I work with some former senior enlisted and officers.They took their jobs on subs very seriously as they do with their civilian jobs.The ones I work with are very smart and good guys.I assumed the Russian submariners were the same and if they are not,we need to be concerned.

    0
  • Warbirds

    The Russians have the largest nuclear stockpile of any nation.

    They don’t need all of them to work in order to change the history of the world. Only one.


    Right now, the world needs 2 things & unfortunately they can only come from within Russia.

    1) an organized amd successful assassination of Putin

    2) A successor to take power and reverse the current course of the Russian military who will also pay full and just concessions to the Nation of Ukraine.

    0
  • Ditch-Runner

    Warbirds

    I suggest we add one more thing for us to vote out the current clows in Washington it would be a great help to us and the world.. well Ok not so much for China

    0
  • dreher

    Warbirds, I completely agree with your two points. It is quite possible we only need your number one accomplished.

    Ditch-Runner I agree with you also but where are we going to find honest, competant men to elect?? It seems the corrupting effects of the political world is almost impossible for most to reject. 😔

    0
  • Smitty500mag

    The chance of a better leader to take Putin's place would probably be pretty slim. They don't claw their way to the top by being good guys.

    Mikhail Gorbachev was one in a billion that tried to change the old ways but he eventually became an emperor without an empire as the Soviet states started demanding independence and then the old Soviet hardliners kidnapped him and evicted him from the Kremlin. I'm surprised they didn't kill him.

    0
  • Merlinnv12

    Mutual Assured Destruction…. MAD

    It’s a MAD, MAD WORLD!

    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?